Monday, October 5, 2020

September 2020 Cookbook Reviews

 


The Duke's Mayonnaise Cookbook: 75 recipes celebrating the perfect condiment by Ashley Strickland Freeman

I came to liking mayonnaise later in life. I was a VERY picky eater as a child and almost everything I ate was "plain." But, once I discovered homemade pimento cheese I discovered Duke's mayonnaise and was hooked. I still don't like a ton of mayo on a sandwich, but I do find it does a lot for a lot of different foods. This cookbook shows just how much you CAN do with mayo - from breakfast all the way to desserts. There were several recipes I wanted to try from this cookbook and I might end up buying it at some point. It also gives the history of this iconic condiment as well. Overall, if you're a fan of Duke's then this is a book you need to check out!



Modern Cast Iron: the complete guide to selecting, seasoning, cooking, and more by Ashley L. Jones

This book is much more than a cookbook. The first 80 pages are information about cast iron pans - their history, how to restore one, how new ones are made, best practices for care, etc. Jones gives a LOT of information before getting into actual recipes. And with cast iron I think that's important. There weren't many recipes I wanted to try, but I did like all the information about finding and caring for cast iron pans.



Hope's Table: everyday recipes from a Mennonite kitchen by Hope Helmuth

Hope Helmuth is a Mennonite living in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia. She grew up on a farm and this cookbook is a blend of Mennonite recipes and traditions with new recipes she's created as well. It's organized like many cookbooks by meal/type of recipe - breakfast, soups, vegetables and side dishes, dessert, etc. But, she adds a chapter called "canning and miscellany" that talks about canning and also making your own basics like pizza or tomato sauce, pickles, etc. There are SO MANY recipes I want to try from this book that I might end up just buying it. Very wholesome, seemingly simple recipes that make the most of in-season ingredients.



The Berkshires Farm Table Cookbook: 125 homegrown recipes from the New England Hills by Elisa Spungen Bildner and Robert Bildner

This book is a collection of recipes from several Berkshire area farms. The book features dozens of short articles about these local farmers and what they grow and do in the area. The recipes are organized by type of dish - breakfast, sandwiches, vegetables, desserts, etc. It's an interesting look at local food in the Berkshire County area of Massachusetts looking at both farmers and recipes. While I didn't find a ton of recipes I wanted to try I did like the format of the book with it's focus on both the farmers and recipes for the food they're producing.



Stunning Spreads: easy entertaining with cheese, charcuterie, fondue, and other shared fare by Chrissie Nelson Rotko

Snack/cheese spreads are all the rage now. In this cookbook the author gives tips for putting together different spread trays in the first two chapters, then there is a chapter on fondue, other dips/spreads, appetizers/snacks, and cocktails. Overall, I feel like there were more actual recipes in this book, but not as many nice pictures of beautiful spreads/trays. I personally feel like Platters and Boards by Shelly Westerhausen is a much more beautiful, inspiring book.









September 2020 Reviews

 


The Way We Eat Now: how the food revolution has transformed our lives, our bodies, and our world by Bee Wilson

In the past two generations food and what we eat has changed massively. There are more and more food options, yet somehow there are also more and more disease and ailments related to diet now than ever before. In The Way We Eat Now, Bee Wilson explores all the ways our eating and diet have changed - for better and for worse - and what we can do to eat better now. Each chapter focuses on one aspect or change to our modern diets from high calorie/nutrient deficient food (fast food and junk food) to the rise of meal kits and food delivery services. One really interesting point she makes is that she thinks the rise in so many restrictive diets (keto, paleo, vegan, etc.) is in response to the overwhelming amount of food choices today. If your diet doesn't "allow" certain foods, you don't have to be the one deciding what to eat. Another interesting paradox is that while meat kits and food delivery services are on an astronomical rise, home cooking is also on the rise despite what media tries to tell us. This is a very interesting look at our current food culture, how we got here, and how we can try to make things better in the future. There are a LOT of research and data in this book, but it's still very readable and not overly dense or scientific. If you're interested in food at all this is a great book to read.

Some quotes I liked:

"There is still a very widespread view that the best way to counteract the rise of obesity is to shame the fat into being less so. The beliefs exist even among policy makers and healthcare professionals. In 2008, a Mississippi State House bill was proposed to prohibit restaurants from serving food to any person who was obese. In the end, the bill didn't pass, but the very fact that it was mooted shows the extent to which weight stigma is still - despite all the evidence to the contrary - regarded as a useful public health tool." (p. 72)

"A significant problem with group 4 foods [highly processed food] from the point of view of consumer health is that they cannot be altered. With a jar of sugar or a bottle of oil in your hand, you as the cook are free to use as much or as little as you like. You might decide to use less sugar in a cake recipe or a dash less oil in a stir-fry. When you are presented with sugar and oil in the form of a doughnut or frozen pizza, the decisions about how much of each ingredient to add have already been made for you. Your only choice is which brand to buy and how much of it to eat." (p. 87)

"Like much of what we eat, sliced industrial bread is a compromise. But at any given time, we compromise more on certain foods than on others. And the choices we make with our money tell us something about what our culture holds to be important...The devaluation of bread speaks of a culture that has stopped seeing food as a fundamental need and started seeing it as a kind of leisure activity." (p. 90)

"When incomes rise, people want to buy the things that prove to themselves that they are living the good life. Sad to say, better bread and higher-quality eggs do not seem to fit the bill. Just because we can afford these foods does not mean that we think they are worth the extra money. The foods that people spend more money on as soon as they have the spare cash tend to be the old prestige foods such as meat - the ones that an earlier generation associated with wealth and success, even if they are now cheapened beyond recognition." (p. 101)

"In 1900, the average American worked 2,700 hours a year. By 2015, the average American worked just 1,790 hours a year and owned a kitchen containing whizzy time-saving gadgets his or her ancestors could only dream of. When we say we lack time to cook - or even time to eat - we are not making a simple statement of fact. We are talking about cultural values and the way that our society dictates that our days should be carved up. The changing rhythms of life have affected our eating in some profound and surprising ways. A sense of time pressure leads us to eat different foods and to eat them in new ways. A collective obsession with not wasting time has contributed to the rise of the snack and the fall of the cooked breakfast, to a rise in convenience foods and the death of the lunch hour." (p. 116-17)

"To read Pomiane is to be reminded that what is often lost today is not the time to eat per se so much as the sense that we are entitled to sit and enjoy our meals, relishing every bite, no matter how long or short the time available for them. For Pomiane, a simply cooked meal of delicious food - and wine, and coffee - was a way to enjoy what little free time an individual might have. Today, by contrast, many people see free time as the thing you get to only after you are done with eating." (p. 136)

"But the rise of eating out has brought problems as well as pleasures. One of the problems is that when special-occasion food becomes a regular occurrence, we don't seem to derive quite the same degree of pleasure from it as before. A team of British food sociologists conducted two studies on attitudes to eating out, first in 1995 and again in 2015. Back in 1995, the sociologists found that most British people - based on a sample of just over a thousand - considered eating out to be very special...They spoke of being entertained and gratified by every aspect of a restaurant meal: the company, the food, the sense that they were participating in an event. It was as if they were determined to derive satisfaction from the experience. When the survey was repeated in 2015, the respondents had lost much of that sense of joy. Eating out now happened much more frequently for most people than twenty years earlier, so much so that they had started to take it for granted. Yet the more of it they did, the less they reported enjoying it. Much of the old specialness and sense of occasion had gone." (p. 187)

"If we never give food the time that it is due, we are effectively saying it doesn't matter. I once met a woman who said that people often asked how she had time to cook. 'How do you have time to watch television?' she would reply." (p. 303)



Big Summer by Jennifer Weiner

Six years after ending her friendship with Drue Cavanaugh, Daphne Berg is doing great. She's become a plus-size Instagram influencer and just landed a huge collaboration that could take her influencer career to the next level. So, when Drue shows up to apologize and ask Daphne to be in her wedding Daphne is hesitant. Every time she's let Drue back in she gets hurt. But, in the end she agrees out of respect for their shared history and also for the chance to spend a weekend in a Cape Cod luxury mansion. But, when something terrible happens to Drue during the wedding weekend, Daphne feels she owes it to her friend to find out what really happened. And in the end she also finds out more about Drue and their friendship really meant.

I'm a big Jennifer Weiner fan, but I didn't love this one. It was a great beach read - and that's actually where I read it over two days at the beach. But, I felt like Drue and Daphne were more caricatures than fully developed characters - especially Drue. Based on what ended their friendship and Daphne's realizations about their childhood friendship I don't think she would have agreed to be in the wedding. It was just VERY quick and seemed out of character for Daphne. Weiner had a previous book, Goodnight Nobody that was more of a mystery than her typical books. Big Summer has that same feel. I'm not a big mystery fiction fan and I was disappointed by both of Weiner's mystery-type books. She is an amazing author, but this one just felt like too much fluff and not much substance.



Saving Jemima: life and love with a hard-luck Jay by Julie Zickefoose

Julie Zickefoose has rehabilitated dozens of song birds and lives on a property she's made into a bird sanctuary. So, when someone contacted her on Facebook about an abandoned baby blue jay she immediately takes in the bird she names Jemima. Once Jemima is out of danger her intellect and instincts are on display all the time. She treats each member of the family differently - including their old dog Chet Baker. Unlike almost all the wild birds Julie rehabilitated, Jemima keeps coming back after she's been released into the wild. It's almost as if she's decided to have the best of both worlds - living in the wild with other jays, but also coming home for special food and attention. A little more than half way through the book the author explains what was going on in her personal life when she took in Jemima - both of her kids were either in college or about to be, her dog was elderly and going downhill, and her husband of more than 20 years was moving out. That would have been better to be at the beginning of the book because it explained SO MUCH about her attachment to Jemima. I just thought she was a very neurotic bird lady until that chapter explained more. I'm not sure why she placed that where she did in the book, but in my opinion it would have made much more sense to explain that from the beginning. The author is also an artist and photographer, so the book is filled with beautiful illustrations and photographs. I didn't love this book as much as I have other animal books, but honestly the photos and illustrations kept me going. I would recommend this more to a hardcore bird watcher/lover than the average animal person like me who is just looking for a unique animal story/book. But, the author is a very talented artist, so maybe pick up the book just to see her artwork and photography.



Simon the Fiddler by Paulette Jiles

At the end of the Civil War Simon Boudlin was finally conscripted into the Confederate army. He had been running and avoiding conscription since the war started. At least he ended up in the regimental band because of his fiddle playing. The other men in the band stick together during one final battle and at the surrender. Once the Confederate army is disbanded, Simon and the other musicians strike out to make money with their music. At a party after the surrender Simon meets Doris Dillon, an indentured servant from Ireland working for a Union military Colonel and his family. Working his way through Texas, Simon works to make money and get closer to Doris. He eventually finds his way to her and realizes her situation with the Colonel's family is terrible and is even more determined to rescue her and make a better life for them on land he's buying. Simon's first love is music and he's an incredibly talented musician, but he's also quick-tempered and proud which often leads to fights. But, he and his friends work together to make a life for themselves in the hard scrabble, post-Civil War wilderness of Texas. Beautifully written and now Jiles has written three books that tie in characters during the same time period in post-Civil War Texas - The Color of LightningNews of the World, and now Simon the Fiddler. My favorite is still News of the World, but this one is right there just behind it. I would love to have a sequel and see what happens further for Simon and Doris or a book with Damon Lessing's back story.



A Honeybee Heart Has Five Openings: a year of keeping bees by Helen Jukes

Helen Jukes is living in Oxford, England and is struggling in her personal life. She's started a new job that she thought would be great, but it's very stressful and draining. She's moved around a lot so many of her friends aren't nearby. When she was living in London she started helping a friend who was an urban beekeeper and she starts thinking about getting a hive for the backyard of her rental house. Thinking about, then planning for her beehive enlivens Helen. She starts making new beekeeping friends and finds that the bees keep her more engaged and feel better overall. She even ends up finding a new love interest through the bees as well.

This book got such great reviews, but I didn't really like it. It was compared a lot to H is for Hawk which also got rave reviews and I HATED that one. But, since this one was about bees I wanted to give it a try. I didn't hate this one, but I just wasn't as into it. Helen gets really into the history of beekeeping and some weird semi bee-related tangents that I felt didn't really help the book. I also just didn't find her very interesting or relatable. I do miss keeping bees and plan to try again, but I didn't love this book. I personally wouldn't recommend it.



The Home Edit Life by Clea Shearer and Joanna Teplin

I put this book on hold because I love organizing books. I didn't know about the author's previous book or the Netflix show until the book came in. I didn't feel like there was much organizing info or help at all in the book - just a lot of beautiful, perfect, rainbow color-coordinated pictures. And most of the pictures were of HUGE spaces that the average person is not going to have in their house. I would LOVE to have a huge closet for all my stockpiled lotion, shampoo, laundry detergent, etc. but I don't so I have to work with what I have - this book didn't help in that way at all. While it's pretty to look at it wasn't very helpful in any real-life way. A lot of the reviews talked about how they liked the book better after watching the show, so I may check the show out just to see. Even if it is huge celebrity houses, I love a good "before and after" show.



She Said: breaking the sexual harassment story that helped ignite a movement by Jodi Kantor & Megan Twohey

On October 5, 2017 Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey published an article outlining decades of sexual harassment and payoffs to women by Harvey Weinstein. Kantor and Twohey spent months secretly interviewing women, former employees, actresses, and business associates of Weinstein. For a variety of reasons, they had trouble getting many women to go on the record with their allegations. A brave few did and once the story was published a veritable tsunami of women came forward with their own allegations against Weinstein - so many that the author could barely keep up with all of them, much less use them all in subsequent articles. This article broke shortly after the #metoo movement started, the Women's March in January 2017, and Trump's election (and his own history with sexual allegations and payoffs). The timing was unplanned, but perfect. Women were finally ready to start telling their stories and not be as afraid of the consequences. But, did any real change happen? Yes, Weinstein was forced to step down and did face some (subsequent) criminal charges, and many men in positions of power were called out and forced to step down as well. But, will things really change for future women? That still remains to be seen.

It was really fascinating to get to see the "behind the scenes" of this story. It's heartbreaking to see successful, famous women still be afraid to speak out about a powerful man. If these women with money and support are still afraid, it helps you to understand more why the average woman may not speak out if/when something happens to her. The majority of the book is the behind the scenes research Kantor and Twohey did for this article, but the last 2 chapters are about Dr. Christine Ford and the Kavanaugh Supreme Court hearings. Several reviews I read said this part of the book just seemed stuck in and I do agree. While there is a link to the authors and Dr. Ford, it was small. I think because this happened after their article came out and is related in topic they wanted to include it, but it did feel forced. It was interesting to see the behind the scenes with Dr. Ford and what transpired in order for her to testify before the Senate and the personal backlash for her and her family. The Epilogue was really interesting as the authors get several of the women together in person for a final interview. For these women who had already agreed to speak out to come together became even more empowering for them and their resolve in what they did. Definitely an interesting book, but I think they could have left out the Dr. Ford/Kavanaugh chapters in order to just really focus on the Weinstein case/story.

Some quotes I liked:

"From what Steel was learning, the language of the deals made them look less like aboveboard legal transactions and more like cover-ups. The agreements included one restrictive clause after another. The women were obliged to turn over all their evidence - audio recordings, diaries, emails, backup files, any other shred of proof - to O'Reilly and his lawyers. They and in one case their attorneys were prohibited from helping any other women who might have similar claims against the host. If they received subpoenas compelling them to talk, they were required to notify O'Reilly and his team, who could fight their being called to testify...Whatever O'Reilly had or hadn't done to the women was thus dropped down a deep well, never to be recovered. Cash for silence; that was the deal." (p. 52-3)

"Jodi cut to the point: The United States had a system for muting sexual harassment claims, which often enabled the harassers instead of stopping them. Women routinely signed away the right to talk about their own experiences. Harassers often continued onward, finding fresh ground on which to commit the same offenses. The settlements and confidentiality agreements were almost never examined in law school classrooms or open court. This was why the public had never really understood that this was happening. Even those in the room with long histories of covering gender issues had never fully registered what was going on." (p. 54)

[Just before the article broke Harvey Weinstein's contract was renewed with TWC] "The company would put a new code of conduct in place. If it ever had to pay settlements as a result of Weinstein's misconduct, Weinstein would be required to cover the costs and be hit with a further series of financial penalties - $250,000 for the first settlement, $500,000 for the second, and so on, up to a million dollars, a whole fee structure for potential future allegations. The contract specified that Weinstein could also be terminated for misconduct. It almost read as if the company expected Weinstein to keep accumulating allegations and that the resultant financial penalties could take care of the problem." (p. 131)

"No one could ever predict how speaking out would go. Forecasting was futile. Once a story was publicly told for the first time, there was no telling what might happen, who might read it, or what others might echo, add, or disagree with. There was no guarantee of affirmation or impact. The results could be wrenching, empowering, or both. But this was what everyone in the room, and more people beyond it, now understood: If the story was not shared, nothing would change. Problems that are not seen cannot be addressed. In our world of journalism, the story was the end, the result, the final product. But in the world at large, the emergence of new information was just the beginning - of conversation, action, change." (p. 260)



This is All I Got: a new mother's search for home by Lauren Sandler

Lauren Sandler wanted to follow a homeless mother for a year in order to write about her story and the effect of poverty and homelessness on a new mother. She meets Camila at a private shelter run by a Catholic charity. Camila is twenty-two, graduated from high school and was enrolled in college before her pregnancy derailed her plans. She grew up in poverty with an abusive and mentally ill mother who kicked her out as a teenager. After that Camila lived in group homes and finally on her own. Despite her circumstances growing up Camila was smart and determined to do better with her life. And she was - until she got pregnant. Camila knew the social services system - all the rules, all the intricacies and contradictions, often more than the employees she interacted with. But, that still didn't help her get out of poverty with her child. Sandler follows Camila and her son from the day he's born until shortly after his first birthday. Along the way Camila tries desperately to find some permanent housing and continue going to college, but time after time she hits roadblocks. She can't get child support without a DNA test proving paternity - that takes until her son is 9 months old - even though she knows who the father is. She's expected to either work or be going to school to qualify for state aid money, but is required to go to offices spread all over New York City and wait for hours only to find out they lost a paper or a form is now outdated, etc.

Camila's story highlights just how little help there is for struggling people - even less so for single parents. But, it also highlights how if she just had some small measure of help - a family member's house to crash at for a few months, her son's father willing to pay for diapers or food or helping care for their son, a day care closer to her school, etc. could make a HUGE difference in her and her son's life. With none of this Camila is 100% on her own and toward the end of her son's first year she is barely surviving. When the author catches back up with her a few years later it's clear she's been struggling just as much all along and ended up dropping out of college. And while you feel terrible for Camila, it's hard not to judge her mistakes and choices. She starts dating someone and thinks she's pregnant again when her son is 5 months old - I was like WHY ARE YOU NOT USING BIRTH CONTROL?!?! When she comes into some money from an workplace injury lawsuit she decides to use some of it to go to the Dominican Republic where her family is from. But, you're thinking you're homeless and you're going on vacation?! In her son's first year she dates and tries to find a partner, but each guy seems worst than the one before. Overall, it's a hard and sad book to read, but it does make me realize how much of a safety net I had growing up with my family. Just one or two small things could have made all the difference for Camila and her son. I would be curious for the author to follow up with her in another few years and see what if anything has changed for her.

A quote I liked:

"Camila gripped hope in her fists so tightly it was like she was trying to transform it into reality by pure pressure." (p. 46)















August 2020 Reviews

 


Secondhand: travels in the new global garage sale by Adam Minter

One of the hottest trends right now is minimalism and decluttering - Marie Kondo's name and catch phrase "spark joy" are household terms. So, what happens with all the stuff we declutter and donate? Adam Minter follows donations around the world. Secondhand explores this often-hidden, multibillion dollar industry of used and recycled goods. Minter sees everything from electronics being repurposed and repaired in Ghana to street markets in Mexico that obtain all their wares from Goodwill stores across the border in the US. He also uncovers new businesses in both the US and Japan that specialize in cleaning out the homes of deceased persons and donating or recycling their belongings that the families don't want. This is a really unique book that explores our relationship with our stuff and how that stuff can also transform the lives of others where secondhand goods are valued. Reading this book will definitely make you question yourself the next time you're in a store, "Do I REALLY need this?"

Some quotes I liked:

"Todd loves rags made from reclaimed textiles. But he can't simply ignore the declining quality of used textiles. So, in recent years, Star Wipers [a rag company] has started to manufacture a new, 100 percent cotton wiping rag from yarn grown and manufactured in North Carolina. 'We can follow it from field to here,' he tells me. The environmental impact of that new rag is steep compared with that of a reclaimed one (growing cotton is highly water intensive)...Star Wipers' 100 percent cotton rag is known as the STB - short for Simply the Best - and around the wiping rag industry, that is a widely acknowledged statement of fact." (p. 163)

[On secondhand child safety seats. Minter notes that parents are DRILLED about how car seats expire and need to be destroyed rather than sold or given away secondhand. In looking into this he could find no actual data that shows that this is the case.] "Professor Kullgren concluded by writing that Folksam's recommendation is that so long as a seat hasn't been in a crash or otherwise doesn't exhibit any damage, it's fine to use. He also noted that seat designs are always improving, so a consumer buying a newer seat is likely getting a safer seat - especially if the old one exceeds ten years in age. But there's nothing illegal or unsafe in using an older one...Thinking back on the [Goodwill] auction, I think it's too bad Target recycled those more than 500,000 seats over the years. They would've sold, and many children south of the border would be safer because their parents had access to a secondhand market." (p. 198-99)

"I suggest that [Robin Ingenthron's] grandfather's advice about repair is from a different era. He corrects me. 'I think it's advice from poor people. People who are poor fix stuff. I was raised that the smartest thing you can do is buy a rich person's broken thing,' he says. 'The best deal you can negotiate is when the rich person doesn't know how easy it is to fix it.'" (p. 228)

"The business model is a unique one. iFixit (with the help of an army of volunteers) creates repair manuals for devices that don't have them and posts them to its website, where anyone can access the information for free. As of this writing, there are more than thirty-eight thousand manuals (and counting) for products ranging from the latest Samsung Galaxy Note smartphone to the Oral-B Vitality electric toothbrush. To monetize this massive informational giveaway, iFixit sells repair parts and tools, as well as software and consulting services. In 2016 the company generated $21 million in sales." (p. 231)

"Recognizing the potential in secondhand markets led Dell to design products that can last longer because their profitable. Right to repair is a means of encouraging reluctant companies uninterested in secondhand to rethink their approach, and hopefully adopt Dell's...As of 2019, more than twenty U.S. states are considering right-to-repair legislation (unsurprisingly, Apple and many other leading consumer electronics companies vigorously oppose them)." (p. 240-41)



This Much Country by Kristin Knight Pace

Kristin Pace grew up in Texas but came to love the rugged terrain and mountains of the West. She attended an outdoors camp in Colorado every year for several years as a teenager and worked there as a counselor during college as well. During her senior year of high school Kristin meets Alfred online. Alfred lives in Montana, was Native American, and five years older than Kristin. Alfred flies out to Texas just before she graduates and a few days after graduation Kristin is driving from Texas to Montana to be with Alfred. Anyone from the outside could see Alfred was a loser and jerk, but Kristin loved him and they eventually got married. They both worked seasonal jobs that often meant they might be apart for weeks at a time. After they had been married a few years Alfred asked for a divorce. Kristin was devastated and her friend in Alaska contacted her about house-sitting and watching a guy's sled dog team for the winter. Having worked with sled dogs in Denali National Park before and already a dog lover Kristin jumps at the opportunity. That decision changes her whole life. She falls in love with sled dogs and decides to stay in Alaska. She also meets Andy and falls in love again. They start their own sled dog kennel and both start entering sled dog races. The book culminates in Kristin finishing the Iditarod, a 1,000 mile sled dog race that was her dream once she started sled dog racing.
While Kristin's story is inspiring, the life of a professional sled dog racer seems ridiculously hard. It's obviously not something that just anyone can do. For Kristin it seemed almost like a calling and she really found herself in being able to manage the dog team and the grueling races on her own. Also, as an aside I just hated Alfred from the beginning. It seemed like everyone around her could see what a jerk he was except her -ugh. I'm glad she didn't waste more time with him and found someone much better for her.

Some quotes I liked:

"'I'm so amazed by you three women,' she said, referring to me, Ryne, and Tamra Reynolds, the only three women running the [Yukon Quest] race. 'I just can't imagine doing what you're doing. You three are so brave. Aren't you terrified of being out there all alone?' She said it like we women had an additional burden to bear. Like our experience would be that much more scary and difficult because we weren't men. And also, like men didn't need to be brave to run the Yukon Quest. Like they just came that way, with bravery built in. 'Well, all of us are doing something we've trained for many years to do,' I said. 'Both the women and the men.'...'Don't you think you should value yourself a bit more?' I asked her. 'You're a woman, and I'm sure you've done some very hard, brave things.'...I was grateful to be in a sport where there were no divisions between men and women. And out on the trail, we could hardly tell one another apart. Underneath the big parkas and frozen ruffs, we were all one thing: dog mushers." (p. 212-13)

[During the Iditarod race in 2016 two dog teams were intentionally attacked by people on snowmachines. One attack left one dog dead and two others injured. Later in the race another female competitor experienced an attempted sexual assault from two men on snowmachines.]
"We should have been focused on surviving in -20 degree temperatures, on traveling a hundred miles a day through unforgiving wild land, on keeping our dogs healthy and exemplifying the pioneer know-how and spirit of thousand-mile mushers. Instead, we were fearing sexual harassment, violence, and rape. Instead, we were fearing what men thought our bodies owed them. How on earth could they watch us go by, these icons of the northland driving powerful dog teams, and have the nerve to reach out and touch one of us? Have such a feeling of entitlement over us as to grab one of our asses? To violate? If they could do that to a total stranger, to a professional athlete passing by on a dogsled, what were they doing to the women in their lives, in their schools, in their houses?...And just like Jeff and Aliy, she would swallow the invasive, pervasive fear and keep going. But unlike Jeff and Aliy, Sarah wasn't attacked at random. She was attacked because she was a woman. And the thought of what those men could have done to her if they had succeeded in pulling her off her sled would haunt me all the way to Nome." (p. 300-302)



Pachinko by Min Jin Lee (Books & Banter book club)

Pachinko follows one Korean family through four generations. Each generation have their own struggles, but the earlier ones struggle through war and having to leave their homeland. For the majority of the book the family is living in Japan and seen as outsiders. Sunja, the only surviving child of Hoonie and Yangjin, shames her family by becoming pregnant by a married man. In a strange twist of events that situation would end up saving her and her family's lives. This unique novel explores not just the struggles of Koreans living in Japan, but also the struggles of a family. What does it mean to provide? What does it mean to receive help? Can someone bad do good things? How do you cope with so much loss? Sunja, her younger son Mozasu, and her grandson Solomon show that no matter the loss or hardship family is a strong thread running through your life. And life, like the Pachinko gambling machines, is always a risk - sometimes you win and sometimes you lose, but you still keep playing.

This is one of those books that I would have NEVER picked up if not for book club. But, it was really good. My only complaint is that the last section of the book had some REALLY weird sexual scenes that just didn't seem to add to the story much at all. I have a really hard time believing the scenes in the Japanese forest too. I could have done without some of that when it wasn't very relevant to the storyline or main characters.

Some quotes I liked:

"Every morning, Mozasu and his men tinkered with the machines to fix the outcomes - there could only be a few winners and a lot of losers. And yet we played on, because we had hope that we might be the lucky ones. How could you get angry at the ones who wanted to be in the game? Etsuko had failed in this important way - she had not taught her children to hope, to believe in the perhaps-absurd possibility that they might win. Pachinko was a foolish game, but life was not." (p. 412)

"In the moments before her death, her mother had said that this man had ruined her life, but had he? He had given her Noa; unless she had been pregnant, she wouldn't have married Isak, and without Isak, she wouldn't have had Mozasu and now her grandson Solomon. She didn't want to hate him anymore. What did Joseph say to his brothers who had sold him into slavery when he saw them again? 'You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives.' This was something Isak had taught her when she'd asked him about the evil of this world." (p. 427)



Chefs' Fridges: more than 35 world-renowned cooks reveal what they eat at home by Carrie Solomon

I wasn't familiar with these authors first book Inside Chef's Fridges, Europe, but when I saw this one it sounded interesting. Like these authors you might think do famous chefs really cook super fancy meals at home? Will there be soda in their fridge? etc. In the Introduction the authors talk about how they both have lived in Paris for a long time, but were both raised in North America, so in this book they wanted to focus on American and Canadian chefs. But, there were a LOT of chefs that were not American of Canadian, so that seemed odd to me. There are hundreds of well-known chefs throughout North America and yet they still ended up including a lot of European chefs. It just seemed to go against the premise of the book. But, each chef had an introduction about how they go into cooking, what they became known for, etc, then pictures of the inside of their fridge with a numbered list explaining the contents, then a Q&A, and finally one or two recipes. Overall, it was interesting, but not amazing.



Educated: a memoir by Tara Westover (Evening Edition book club, re-read)

The first time Tara Westover heard of the Holocaust she was in a college classroom. Westover grew up the youngest of seven children born to survivalist Mormon parents. Westover's father owned a scrap metal yard and sometimes worked construction and her mother was a midwife and herbalist. They didn't believe in public education or modern medicine - all the children were homeschooled, but mostly that meant working either in the scrap yard or in the kitchen (but only for Tara and her sister since women belong in the kitchen). This is the life Tara sees herself living as an adult since she knows nothing else. But when her older brother Tyler gets into college he opens the door to her as well. He encourages her to take the ACT and after teaching herself enough math to pass she is accepted to BYU. Once in college Tara begins to see that almost everything she was taught by her parents was wrong, but by reading and studying Tara begins to open more doors for herself through education. But, going home between semesters gets harder and harder as she begins to see her family and life growing up through new eyes - her father is very likely bipolar and her brother Shawn is violently abusive to everyone in his path (and it's excused away by her family time and time again). Finally after Shawn repeatedly threatens to kill her she is cut off by her family - she didn't cut them off THEY cut her off as she is obviously demon-possessed for wanting Shawn to address his issues. She is able to maintain a relationship with two of her brothers - both of whom are educated and aren't financially tied to the family businesses. In the same vein of The Glass Castle, it's a miracle that Westover is able to get out of her family and graduate with a PhD, but Westover's childhood was much more abusive. It's really a miracle that all seven children lived into adulthood with the horrific accidents and injuries that happened to most of them - only going to the hospital with the direst of injuries and often not even then. Westover shows the value of education through her life story and is an inspiration.

Notes after re-reading August 2020:

I was really looking forward to re-reading this book, but it was much harder to read the second time around. This time because I already knew it was coming it was harder to read about all the physical abuse from her brother Shawn and how Tara herself tried to explain it away or make it her own fault. It was also more obvious when reading it again how much Tara doubted herself and was torn between her family and herself. I feel like if she had reached out to Tyler earlier things would have been much easier for her. He grew up the same way and went to college and thrived, but somehow she continued to think the problem was her - not the abuse and lack of education and care from her family. I think the first time reading it the story is so bizarre at times that you aren't paying as close of attention, but reading it again it was much sadder and harder to read. Tara accomplished so much with NO HELP from almost anyone in her family, yet she continued to see herself as less than everyone else. I'm glad she has relationships with two of her brothers and some other extended family, but I doubt her parents or other siblings will ever come around.

Some quotes I liked:

"'I know you think we're being unfair,' she said. 'but when I was your age I was living on my own, getting ready to marry your father.' 'You were married at sixteen?' I said. 'Don't be silly,' she said. 'You are not sixteen.' I stared at her. She stared at me. 'Yes, I am. I'm sixteen.' She looked me over. 'You're at least twenty.' She cocked her head. 'Aren't you?' We were silent. My heart pounded in my chest. 'I turned sixteen in September,' I said. 'Oh.' Mother bit her lip, then she stood and smiled. 'Well, don't worry about it then. You can stay. Don't know what your dad was thinking, really. I guess we forgot. Hard to keep track of how old you kids are.'" (p. 137)

"...I had finally begun to grasp something that should have been immediately apparent: that someone had opposed the great march toward equality; someone had been the person from whom freedom had to be wrested. I did not think of my brother as that person; I doubt I will ever think of him that way. But something had shifted nonetheless. I had started on a path of awareness, had perceived something elemental about my brother, my father, myself. I had discerned the ways in which we had been sculpted by a tradition given to us by others, a tradition of which we were either willfully or accidentally ignorant. I had begun to understand that we had lent our voices to a discourse whose sole purpose was to dehumanize and brutalize others - because nurturing that discourse was easier, because retaining power always feels like the way forward." (p. 180)

"'I have been teaching in Cambridge for thirty years,' he said. 'And this is one of the best essays I've read.' I was prepared for insults but not for this...I could tolerate any form of cruelty better than kindness. Praise was a poison to me; I choked on it. I wanted the professor to shout at me, wanted it so deeply I felt dizzy from the deprivation." (p. 240)

"I'd never heard anyone use the word 'feminism' as anything but a reprimand. At BYU, 'You sound like a feminist' signaled the end of the argument. It also signaled that I had lost." (p. 258)

"Everything I had worked for, all my years of study, had been to purchase for myself this one privilege: to see and experience more truths than those given to me by my father, and to use those truths to construct my own mind. I had come to believe that the ability to evaluate many ideas, many histories, many points of view, was at the heart of what it means to self-create. If I yielded now, I would lose more than an argument. I would lose custody of my own mind. This was the price I was being asked to pay, I understood that now. What my father wanted to cast from me wasn't a demon: it was me." (p. 304)

"I didn't understand it then, and I don't understand it now, but there was something nourishing in setting aside that time each week, in the act of admitting that I needed something I could not provide for myself." (p. 316)

"Now I thought about it, I realized that all my siblings, except Richard and Tyler, were economically dependent on my parents. My family was splitting down the middle - the three who had left the mountain, and the four who had stayed. The three with doctorates, and the four without high school diplomas. A chasm had appeared, and was growing." (p. 326)

Quotes to highlight after re-reading August 2020:

"Dad's mother worked for the Farm Bureau in town. As an adult, Dad would develop fierce opinions about women working, radical even for our rural Mormon community. 'A woman's place is in the home,' he would say every time he saw a married woman working in town. Now I'm older, I sometimes wonder if Dad's fervor had more to do with his own mother than with doctrine. I wonder if he just wished that she had been home, so he wouldn't have been left for all those long hours with Grandpa's temper." (p. 26)

"'It's time to go, Tara,' Tyler said. 'The longer you stay, the less likely you will ever leave.' 'You think I need to leave?' Tyler didn't blink, didn't hesitate. 'I think this is the worst possible place for you.' He's spoken softly, but it felt as though he'd shouted the words...Tyler stood to go. 'There's a world out there, Tara,' he said. 'And it will look a lot different once Dad is no longer whispering his view of it in your ear.'" (p. 120)

"I wanted to believe him, to take his words and remake myself, but I'd never had that kind of faith. No matter how deeply I interred the memories, how tightly I shut my eyes against them, when I thought of my self, the images that came to mind were of that girl, in the bathroom, in the parking lot. I couldn't tell Dr. Kerry about that girl. I couldn't tell him that the reason I couldn't return to Cambridge was the being here threw into great relief every violent and degrading moment of my life. At BYU I could almost forget, allow what had been to blend into what was. But the contrast here was too great, the world before my eyes too fantastical." (p. 242-43)

"Only then did I understand where the shame came from: it wasn't that I hadn't studied in a marble conservatory, or that my father wasn't a diplomat. It wasn't that Dad was half out of his mind, or that Mother followed him. It had come from having a father who shoved me toward the chomping blades of the Shear, instead of pulling me away from them. It had come from those moments on the floor, from knowing that Mother was in the next room, closing her eyes and ears to me, and choosing, for that moment, not to be my mother at all." (p. 273)



The #MeToo Reckoning: facing the church's complicity in sexual abuse and misconduct by Ruth Everhart

Ruth Everhart works as a Presbyterian pastor, but she is also a victim of sexual assault and sexual harassment. Long before the #metoo movement sexual assault and harassment victims struggled to tell their stories and receive compassionate responses when they did. You would think that the Church, a haven for broken people finding healing through Christ, would be better in handling this issue. But, unfortunately that is not always the case. Everhart shows some of the reasons why the Church hasn't handled sexual assault and harassment well and gives current and Biblical examples. Unfortunately the Church has tended to shy away from discussing sexuality overall, which tends to lead to shame for victims and easy targets for predators. Everhart gives solid tips for how Church leaders can do better and be more aware of these issues, how to prevent them, and how to better deal with them when they happen. While parts of this book are hard to read, Everhart does give hope that the Church can do better with this issue. So, while it is a hard read, it is also a hopeful read.

Some quotes I liked:

"Let me be clear about another thing: I am not a liberal feminist. I am a radical feminist. Which is to say, it's not enough that individual women can thrive in a patriarchal culture. As long as women as a group are treated as less than men, it doesn't matter that individual women can experience success. Inequality is not what God intends for human society. Inequality is certainly not what Jesus modeled. My love for Jesus is why I embrace the #MeToo movement. As imperfect as it is, this collective action highlights the ways that inequality breeds abuse. It has garnered the power to push back against that abuse, pushback that is long overdue. I feel frustrated when Christians treat #MeToo as a sinful movement dripping with the venom of feminism. Feminism is not a hateful ideology. It's the belief that women are people too." (p. 6-7)

"While complementarians insist that these gendered roles are equal in value, in practice they are not. From my childhood, I know that the roles do not feel equal. Certainly the dynamic created is one of unequal power. This is an enormous problem. Sexual abuse is always the abuse of power. I am not alone in connecting the dots between a conservative view of gender roles and increased harm from sexual abuse." (p. 12)

"Making an untimely push toward so-called reconciliation is a way religious people commonly deal with wrong doing. Real reconciliation lies at the end of a long road and is rarely achieved. It involves the pursuit of accountability and justice, which takes time and intentionality." (p. 68)

"I learned that many people equate healing with silence. I sometimes receive messages from people who hope I will finally find healing. While I don't believe they intend to convey condescension, what they unintentionally echo is the premise at the heart of my memoir: that when a woman is raped, she is viewed as permanently damaged. To some people, the rape stain has apparently lingered on me some forty years - since I'm still writing about it. The implication is that when I'm healed I will stop writing about sexual assault. In other words, their goal is my silence." (p. 106)

"Since the story line involves David having sex with Bathsheba, David's sin is often labeled as adultery. But adultery is an odd label for a king who's polygamous and has access to dozens of concubines. What marital bond has he violated? David's targeting of Bathsheba is altogether different from a modern-day husband stepping out on a spouse. More precisely, what David did with Bathsheba is an abuse of his power. David exploited the enormous power differential that existed between men and women in general, and between himself and any vassal, in order to have sex with a particular woman. The word for that crime is rape....When I was a child, David's 'downfall' was blamed on Bathsheba's beauty. This is a cunning interpretation. It sidesteps the question of identifying David's sin - adultery, theft, or rape - and simply makes Bathsheba responsible for it. The victim is to blame for being victimized." (p. 122-23)

"For instance, the concept of consent is intrinsic to sexual activity, yet it is totally absent from purity culture. The emphasis on the submission of a wife to a husband downplays a woman's ability - or need - to exercise agency. If she must submit, how can she consent? Paradoxically, a woman is often seen as responsible for her own victimization." (p. 127)











July 2020 Cookbook Reviews

 


The Kerber's Farm Cookbook: a year's worth of seasonal country cooking by Nick Voulgaris III

I picked up this cookbook just because I love anything that's focused on seasonal ingredients. But, I wasn't familiar with Kerber's Farm in Long Island, NY before. After reading just the introduction and a few of the other articles throughout the book I am really curious about this place. I would love to see a longer, non-fiction book about the farm and how Nick Voulgaris reinvented it currently. All of the recipes are organized by season and he talks about canning, beekeeping, gardening, etc. - all things I love and appreciate. I did find a few recipes I'd like to try, but seriously I would love to read a longer book about Voulgaris's reinvention of Kerber's Farm!



Faith, Family, & the Feast: recipes to feed your crew from the grill, garden, and iron skillet by Kent & Shannon Rollins

I recognized Kent from a Chopped barbecuing competition and remembered he seemed like such a genuine person, so when I saw his cookbook I wanted to check it out. Kent gives a lot of stories about his youth growing up in rural Oklahoma, but I felt like he didn't talk too much about his life now. He seems to think that everyone just understand what "chuck wagon cooking" is and while I can guess it wasn't super clear. But, like I remembered him from TV, he's just a genuine person who loves cooking and wants to share that with others. His wife, Shannon, did all the photography for the book which is very impressive. There are several recipes I'd like to try too. Overall, a good cookbook that kind of reminds me of a male-version of The Pioneer Woman - hearty, solid recipes that would fill you up after a long day of working with cattle (not like I do that or anything).



July 2020 Reviews

 


Hidden Valley Road: inside the mind of an American family by Robert Kolker

Don and Mimi Galvin seemed to be living the American Dream. The Air Force brings the Galvin family to Colorado and they find a beautiful home large enough for their 12 children. Every Sunday the whole family dressed up for church and looked picture perfect. But, inside their house on Hidden Valley Road things were definitely not perfect. Starting with Donald, the oldest, six of the twelve children were diagnosed with schizophrenia one after the other, while the other six lived in constant fear that they might be next. The Galvins tried to keep their children's mental illness a secret, but as the number of mentally ill children increased that became harder to do. Eventually everyone avoided the family and the strange antics of the mentally ill became almost commonplace in their neighborhood. Even as their family fell apart, the Galvin parents still seemed to cling to secrets - many were only uncovered after their deaths. In Hidden Valley Road Robert Kolker explores the phenomenon of the Galvin family's mental illness and also the history and treatment of schizophrenia, which sadly hasn't improved as much as treatments for other illnesses has over time. Kolker does an amazing job of telling this family's terrible story with compassion, while also highlighting the plight and mystery of mental illness even today.

When I first heard about this book I couldn't imagine growing up in a family like this. I thought I would feel sorrier for the parents, but really they were pretty terrible parents long before any of their kids showed signs of mental illness. They had no control over their children, yet they just kept having more. There was so much physical fighting between the boys that it was like something from Lord of the Flies and the parents were just like, "whatever, boys will be boys." Then I never expected there to be so much sexual abuse. The two youngest children, both girls, were molested by not one, but two of their brothers. There are questions about whether some of the younger brothers were molested as well, but with their schizophrenia it's hard to tell what is a true experience and what is a delusion. Then at least some of the older boys were also molested by a trusted priest who helped Mimi convert to Catholicism. I felt the worst for the "normal"/non-mentally ill children. In a family of 12 the odds are low that you're going to get a lot of one-on-one attention from your parents, but when 6 of the 12 children are seriously mentally ill and in and out of hospitals you don't stand a chance as a "healthy" child. It's sad to see that the siblings don't have great relationships today. Many of the "healthy" children escaped and have little to do with their mentally ill siblings. Only Lindsay/Mary the youngest really tries to help her mentally ill siblings and encourages her other healthy siblings to do the same. But, I can only imagine the kinds of deep wounds you would have growing up in a family like this. Mental illness is sad and terrifying, but for a family like this it almost seems like some kind of genetic punishment for everyone - sick and healthy alike.

Some quotes I liked:

"For a family, schizophrenia is, primarily, a felt experience, as if the foundation of the family is permanently tilted in the direction of the sick family member. Even if just one child has schizophrenia, everything about the internal logic of that family changes. But the Galvin never were an ordinary family. In the years when Donald was the first, most conspicuous case, five other Galvin brothers were quietly breaking down." (p. xviii)

"The great break between Freud and Jung took place largely over the issue of the nature of madness itself. Early psychoanalysis's greatest partnership was over. But the argument over the origins and nature of schizophrenia was only just beginning." (p. 19)

"Practically every drug prescribed for psychosis, from Donald's time until now, has been a variation on Thorazine or clozapine. Thorazine and its successors became knowns as 'typical' neuroleptic drugs, while clozapine and its heirs were 'atypical,' the Pepsi to Thorazine's Coke. Like Thorazine, clozapine could be dangerous: Concerns over drastically low blood pressure and seizures were serious enough to take it off the market for more than a decade. Even so, drugs became the common treatment of schizophrenia, and the psychiatric profession's great schism only widened. On one side of the street, doctors at the large state hospitals said schizophrenia required drugs, while the therapists in more rarefied settings still recommended psychotherapy. Like most families, the Galvin were at the mercy of what was a mental health care system in name only, forced to choose from options they weren't equipped to assess." (p. 87-88)

"In the calculus of their preteen minds, blocking out the nighttime encounters with Jim and his violence toward his wife was the price Margaret and Mary had to pay to gain a few days of liberty from the house on Hidden Valley Road. It was more than that. Being with Kathy and Jimmy gave the a sense of belonging they couldn't get at home, not when so much attention was being paid elsewhere. They both so dreaded Donald that in the contest between Donald and Jim, Jim won. That, if nothing else, explained why they both kept coming back." (p. 101)

[After Brian's murder/suicide] "But what only Mimi and Don knew, and told no one for many years, was that sometime before his death, Brian had been prescribed Navane, an antipsychotic. There is no known record of the diagnosis that called for that prescription - mania, or depressive psychosis, or trauma-induced psychosis, or a psychotic break triggered by the habitual use of psychedelic drugs. The other children never learned when their parents first knew about this. But both Don and Mimi must have understood that one of the conditions Navane treats is schizophrenia. The thought of another insane son - their amazing Brian, of all people - was so devastating to them, they kept his prescription secret for decades." (p. 129-30)

"Matt's first admission to Pueblo [state mental hospital] was on December 7, 1978. Five days later, Peter joined him there, for his third visit to Pueblo that year. Donald was also cycling in and out of Pueblo that year - three Galvin brothers on separate wards of the same hospital, for what would not be the last time. From then on, when Mary was alone with Matt and Peter, she locked herself in her parents' room until someone else came home." (p. 169-70)

[When Lindsay/Mary tells her mother about Jim's molestation] "Mimi was talking about her own experience, skipping right past the details of what Lindsay was saying about Jim. Lindsay needed Mimi to take her side, to tell her that what Jim had done to her was wrong. But Mimi did not do that. She had never picked the side of a healthy child against a sick one, and she wasn't going to start now. Instead, Mimi started talking about how Jim was mentally ill. Lindsay flushed. To her, schizophrenia wasn't an excuse for what Jim had done to her. Certainly no mainstream researcher or psychiatrist would say that it was Jim's psychotic delusions that made him a pedophile. But Mimi was not willing to separate the two issues. Lindsay, though she expected as much, was still deeply hurt. What made it so hard for her mother to sympathize with anyone other than her boys? It was as if she had used up all of her compassion on the sick children, even Jim, leaving nothing for anyone else. But that day, Lindsay was ready. She told her mother she would never agree to be in the same room as her brother [Jim] again." (p. 199-200)

[After Mimi's death Lindsay uncovers that her father was receiving ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) for years before his death and no one knew] "Mimi had to have known about Don's ECT sessions. She'd gone there with him, and no doubt driven him home afterward, as often as once a month for years on end. She'd kept this secret, too. To be a member of the Galvin family is to never stop tripping on land mines of family history, buried in odd places, stashed away out of shame." (p. 313)

"There is no way of knowing how life might have been different fro the Galvin brothers if the culture of mental illness had been less rigid, less inclined to cut people off from mainstream society, more proactive about intervening when warning signs first appeared. But there is, perhaps, reason to hope that for people like the Galvin born fifty years from now, things could be different, even transformed." (p. 323)



The Lies That Bind by Emily Giffin

I've always loved Emily Giffin's books and have seen her speak at book events a few times as well. Her last book, All We Ever Wanted was so timely with the #metoo movement, but this one was TERRIBLE.

The main character Cecily is 28 and just broke up with her long-time boyfriend because he didn't want to get married. It's May 2001. She's doubting her life in New York City, her career, and her decision to break up with her boyfriend. At a bar she meets Grant who she has an instant connection with. They start a whirlwind romance, but Grant has a LOT of baggage - both of his parents are dead and his twin brother has ALS (which is also what his mother died from). He is leaving for the summer to take his brother for an experimental treatment in the UK. He arrives home on September 10, 2001 briefly sees Cecily then goes to work. But the next day is 9/11 and Grant works in one of the World Trade Center towers. In the aftermath of 9/11 Cecily realizes that she is not the only one looking for Grant - he is married and his wife has put up missing posters.

Here is where the book REALLY gets bad. Up to this point it was pretty ridiculous, but now it gets stupid ridiculous. Cecily meets up with Grant's wife several times under the pretense of interviewing her for the newspaper she works for. Then she and Grant's wife Amy, actually start becoming friends - that is some sociopath behavior right there. Cecily gets back with her boyfriend who immediately proposes. Then she finds out she's pregnant - she slept with Grant on 9/10 and Matthew a few days later so who's baby is it?! *Cue the Jerry Springer music* Then, Amy wants to help plan her wedding with Matthew and turns out she and Matthew know each other their families go way back - Matthew was even at Amy and Grant's wedding! WTF! Then, Cecily tries to have some closure about Grant by reaching out to his ill brother - only turns out Grant faked his death in 9/11 because he was also in trouble with the Feds for insider trading - that's how he paid for his brother's experimental treatment. So, his brother committed suicide, Grant faked his death and has been hiding out in their family cabin in the Adirondacks. Are we in a Lifetime TV movie yet? After this encounter Cecily confesses everything to Matthew who promptly wants to "postpone" the wedding until he knows whether the baby is his or not. She also confesses to Amy who already knew about her and Grant but is also a sociopath and didn't care?! Cecily moves back home to Wisconsin and prepares to be a single mother. Just before the delivery Grant shows up to tell her he's going to turn himself in and face the music. He goes to federal prison for a year and Cecily has the baby - who is of course Grant's. Once Grant is out of prison he moves to Wisconsin as well and guess what?! They all live happily ever after! Wow. This is honestly one of the worst storylines I've read. I only kept reading because I've always liked Emily Giffin so much and I did want to see if Grant and Cecily ended up together in the end.

Some reviews crucified Giffin for using 9/11 as a plot point, but I think Giffin was living in New York City during 9/11 so I give her a little bit of a pass for that. But, the whole Grant faking his death in 9/11 is a pretty terrible way to use 9/11 in the book plot. The whole plot line was really just terrible and way too outlandish to be even semi-believable. I am pretty disappointed in this book. If I had read the reviews I would have seen this coming, but I didn't bother because I've read all her books so of course I'm going to read the new one. I'm just glad I got it from the library and didn't buy it!



Beyond Labels: a doctor and a farmer conquer food confusion one bite at a time by Sina McCullough, PhD and Joel Salatin, Farmer

There is so much conflicting information out there about what we should eat. Thousands of new diet books are published every year claiming they have "the solution" whether it's paleo, keto, whole30, Atkins, etc. With so much information out there how do you decide what to eat? That's where this unique book comes in - a collaboration between Polyface farmer and master of the unorthodox Joel Salatin and Dr. Sina McCullough, a Ph.D. in Nutrition who reversed her autoimmune disorder through diet. Written like a conversation between Joel and Sina, the book covers how to chart your own food path and the steps to take in order to get to optimum health. The first section covers creating your personalized roadmap to health. There are questions to help you create goals for both health and eating and a quiz designed to help you see where you currently are with food and where you'd like to be. The second section is the largest and gives 34 tips on how to shift from low to high quality processed food. The third section gives tips for shifting from high quality processed food to whole foods. The fourth section gives tips on shifting from whole foods to locally grown whole foods. The fifth section gives tips on going from locally grown food to growing your own food. At the end of the book in the Appendix Joel and Sina both give a brief biography and share how they met and decided to collaborate on this book.

I'm a HUGE Joel Salatin fan, so I'm always excited when he has a new book. This one is very different, but still very challenging and inspiring. I really like that they go from making better choices with processed food all the way to growing your own food. Having drastically changed my own diet about 10 years ago it is a process and I'm still not perfect or where I want to be. I really appreciate that they both understand that eating better is a process and they have so many great tips to help people improve with manageable steps. I also really liked the first section and want to go back and think more about what goals I want to work toward and things I could do better. This is honestly a book for ANYONE who wants to improve their eating, but might feel overwhelmed with all the choices/plans/ideas out there.

Some quotes I liked:

[on preservatives in food] "I saw one of the greatest demonstrations of this in California at a school farm...one of the first assignments for the students was to bring some food to class. Students brought Twizzlers, Oreo cookies, gummy worms, marshmallows and squeezable cheese. The teachers brought an orange, apple, lettuce and a green bean. The students put all their contributions in the worm box on one end and the teachers put theirs in the other end. The next week the students ran to the box, opened the lid, and found all their contributions sitting there untouched. The teachers' contributions, on the other hand, were completely gone. Digested. As the students puzzled over the phenomenon, the teachers made their point: 'why would you want to eat something worms won't even eat?' Wow! The point is, what drives life is death and decomposition. If it won't rot, it won't decay. If it won't rot, it won't digest." (p. 107-8)

"Back in 1985, Monsanto was manufacturing rBGH [recombinant bovine growth hormone]. They conducted experiments on cows across the United States by injecting them with rBGH - the first genetically engineered hormone in our food supply. Nobody knew what would happen. Yet, beginning in 1985, the FDA allowed Monsanto to sell the experimental milk (and meat) for human consumption with no restrictions while the rBGH drug was still in the experimental phase of development. Even worse, the FDA did not require those experimental products to be labeled. That means, for 8 years, she of us drank experimental milk and ate experimental meat without knowing it. And when the GAO [Government Accountability Office] called them out, the FDA stood behind their decision...'The FDA does not require the labeling of food products derived from animals involved in drug treatment trials...we [the GAO] believe the public should have the right to know which food products have been produced from animals being tested with investigational drugs. Consequently, we disagree with the FDA on this point.'" (p. 148)

[Things that came to light during litigation against Monsanto over Roundup cancer claims] "Monsanto wrote research papers in secret and then passed them off as written by scientists in academia. A Monsanto executive told other company officials that costs could be kept down by writing research papers themselves and then hiring academics to put their names on the papers....The U.S. Department of Heath and Human Services planned to conduct a scientific review of the safety of glyphosate. But senior EPA officials killed the review...Even though Monsanto adamantly claims that Roundup is safe for us to eat and does not cause cancer, Monsanto's lead toxicologist stated in her deposition that she 'cannot say that Roundup does not cause cancer' because 'we [Monsanto] have not done the carcinogenicity [cancer] studies with Roundup.'" (p. 167)

"How much glyphosate gets used, anyway? On soybeans alone, 120 million pounds. On corn alone, 95 million pounds. All other uses amount to about 60 million pounds. Add all those up and you have 275 million pounds...every year that's how much Roundup herbicide is dumped onto the U.S. That doesn't count use in any other country." (p. 168)

"I've decided the most prominent benchmark designating folks who 'get it' with food is leftovers...By definition, leftovers means that you did not eat single service portions. How much food today is sold in single service packaging?" (p. 191)

"When Teresa and I go to potlucks, she always brings at least two and often three dishes - more than anyone else. The reason is so I'll have something to eat. She puts it on the table with all the other dishes, but I make sure I know which ones are hers. Then when I go through the line I concentrate on her stuff." (p. 194) I do the SAME - especially with holiday meals.

"One of the most intriguing things to me, in this domestic culinary space, is that at the very time in history when we've never enjoyed so many labor-saving techno-gadgets, we've never been more reluctant to prepare our own food. As food prepared outside the home escalates north of 50 percent these days, our techno-glitzy kitchens sit idle, and that's a shame. Never in history has cooking been more efficient. Never before has from-scratch cooking been easier. And yet here we are buying highly processed foods and going out to eat routinely." (p. 263)




House Lessons: renovating a life by Erica Bauermeister

When Erica Bauermeister's family comes back to Seattle after living in Italy for two years she finds she wants to recreate the slower-paced closeness their family had in Italy. On a whim she starts looking at houses or property in Port Townsend, a small coastal town about 2 hours away from Seattle. When Erica sees the old abandoned looking house that's not even for sale yet, she knows this is THE HOUSE. After almost two years of wrangling with estate attorneys and inspectors the house is theirs and they volunteered to clean out all the contents - which turn out to be something out of Hoarders. During the years they spend renovating the house Erica starts to see how the house is doing more for their family than she originally intended. Each family member grows and changes based on the work they do and Erica starts to see things she needs to work on in both her parenting and marriage. Renovating this house helped her see the parts of herself that needed renovating as well. The only thing that was disappointing to me was that just when the house is finished they decide to rent it out. Wait, WHAT?! I can't imagine doing all that work to your "dream house" and then renting it out. They do eventually move into it full time several years later, but I thought that was really odd. At the beginning of the book you're not sure where the house renovation falls into Erica's writing career, then you find out that the house also sparked her first successful novel, The School of Essential Ingredients. Overall, it was an interesting book and a unique look at home renovations and how they can spark personal renovations as well.

Some quotes I liked:

"When I was a real estate agent, I used to ask my clients how they cooked. They usually thought I was trying to find out what kind of kitchen they wanted - and that was true, in part. But the question was really a way to find out how they approached life. Those who had little interest in cooking generally has even less in home maintenance and remodeling. Chefs who loved the planning of a meal - from researching recipes to finding the right ingredients - often had the temperament to design their own homes, and they could envision stunning remodels. But a fixer-upper requires a different kind of creativity, the kind that you often find in a cook whose mind is awakened by opening a refrigerator to an odd assortment of ingredients, knowing that dinner must come out of it. A cook sees leftovers as a chance to make something new and beautiful, and when someone with this kind of personality sees an old house, they are likely to want to save it." (p. 10)

"We'd left Italy, a place which celebrated motherhood, and had moved back to a country where stay-at-home mothers were disregarded at best. The reentry was hard for me. Cooking gave me an identity in the way Ben's job gave him his. I didn't want to share. And yet when we invited people over for dinner, I would always end up incredibly frustrated. Ben would be out in the main part of the house, telling jokes and making sure everyone was having a good time. I was in the kitchen, where I wanted to be - unless, of course, it was where I was expected to be. By the time the food was ready, I was no fun to be around. Once a year, generally in January when the weeks were long and wet and dark, Ben and I would have our annual argument, and the topic was always the same - I wanted a more equal division of labor in our household. It got to the point where the fight even had its own name: Party Boy and Kitchen Girl." (p. 151-52)

"So many of us declare that we will not become our parents. But they are the house we are born into. Their lives, their rules, their loves are the walls that surround us, make us. No matter what, we will always be renovations, never a clean slate. The trick, as with any renovation, is keeping the good bones." (p. 160-61)