Such a Fun Age by Kiley Reid (Evening Edition book club)
Alix Chamberlain is a woman used to getting what she wants. She runs a successful confidence-driven brand, has two small kids, and a loving husband. She's not thrilled about moving back to Philadelphia from New York City, but it only made since once the second child came along. Now she can have the big, beautiful home to complete her family life. One night there is an emergency and Alix calls her regular babysitter Emira Tucker to take their two-year-old daughter out of the house while they deal with the police. Emira takes Briar to the nearby grocery store where the toddler loves to look at all the food. But while they are there another customer and the store security guard confront Emira and accuse her of kidnapping Briar. A bystander films the encounter. The crisis is averted when Emira calls Mr. Chamberlain who rushes over and reams out the store security guard. The bystander offers to email Emira the video in case she wants to press charges or anything. Then later Emira runs into the bystander again and they start dating. What Emira doesn't know is that her new boyfriend, Kelley, used to date her boss Alix and according to Alix, Kelley ruined her senior year of high school. After an explosive Thanksgiving dinner where this all comes to light, Emira struggles with the overlapping of her personal and professional lives. Then someone leaks the video and Emira thinks only she and Kelley have access to it. Such a Fun Age is an incredibly well-written novel with lots of twists and a surprise ending.
I honestly wouldn't have picked this book up except for one of my book clubs reading it, but I LOVED it. Reid does an incredible job with both the main characters. Alix has a weird fixation on Emira and truly thinks they can be real friends even when it's super obvious they can't. Emira really enjoys babysitting Briar and seems to appreciate her quirky personality more than her own mother does. There are a lot of interesting dynamics at work throughout the book with all the characters. Very well done. I can't wait to see what Kiley Reid comes out with next.
I honestly wouldn't have picked this book up except for one of my book clubs reading it, but I LOVED it. Reid does an incredible job with both the main characters. Alix has a weird fixation on Emira and truly thinks they can be real friends even when it's super obvious they can't. Emira really enjoys babysitting Briar and seems to appreciate her quirky personality more than her own mother does. There are a lot of interesting dynamics at work throughout the book with all the characters. Very well done. I can't wait to see what Kiley Reid comes out with next.
All the Young Men by Ruth Coker Burks
Ruth Coker Burks is at the hospital visiting her friend who's just had surgery. While there she witnesses three nurses drawing straws to see who will go in to care for a patient in a room marked "biohazard." Curious, Ruth goes over to the door and hears someone calling out for help - realizing none of the nurses are going in she goes in and ends up sitting with a young man dying of AIDS for several hours until his death. This starts her work with the local AIDS community. Soon hospitals are calling her at home when another AIDS patient is dumped off at the hospital for their final hours of life. Soon she is helping men who are sick, but not yet dying. She finds social services for them, housing, dumpster dives for food to cook for them - all while working and taking care of her daughter. She expands into helping spread information at local gay bars and drag shows, then moves on to strip clubs. Once she realizes the scope of the work she just dives in despite the fact that not many people want to help her and most of the town treats her like a pariah, but she just carries on doing the work she knows needs to be done.
This is an eye-opening book about the beginning of the AIDS epidemic in the South where there already wasn't much acceptance for homosexuality. It was infuriating to read about how the doctors, nurses, and hospitals treated these suffering people. But, sadly today there's still some of that with hospitals talking about refusing treatment for unvaccinated COVID patients (not that this is on the same scale, but in the same vein) because your "choices" led to this. Almost as infuriating was the overt sexual harassment Ruth faced just about everywhere - trying to find jobs, at AIDS conferences - men telling her they couldn't hire her because they would want to sleep with her. This book started in the mid-1980's but I was still surprised just how blatant it was and yet she just shut them down and moved on. This is really an amazing story of how one woman really stepped up to help people just because she saw the need and felt like it was the right thing to do. When these men were dying and their own families turned them away Ruth was there for them right up to the very end. Definitely a woman and a story worth knowing about.
This is an eye-opening book about the beginning of the AIDS epidemic in the South where there already wasn't much acceptance for homosexuality. It was infuriating to read about how the doctors, nurses, and hospitals treated these suffering people. But, sadly today there's still some of that with hospitals talking about refusing treatment for unvaccinated COVID patients (not that this is on the same scale, but in the same vein) because your "choices" led to this. Almost as infuriating was the overt sexual harassment Ruth faced just about everywhere - trying to find jobs, at AIDS conferences - men telling her they couldn't hire her because they would want to sleep with her. This book started in the mid-1980's but I was still surprised just how blatant it was and yet she just shut them down and moved on. This is really an amazing story of how one woman really stepped up to help people just because she saw the need and felt like it was the right thing to do. When these men were dying and their own families turned them away Ruth was there for them right up to the very end. Definitely a woman and a story worth knowing about.
Wholehearted Faith by Rachel Held Evans
Rachel Held Evans was well-known in certain Christian circles. She was an incredible writer and never shied away from the hard questions in Christianity. She died so young and unexpectedly and this was the book she was working on at the time of her death. Her husband asked a close friend of hers to put this book together from what she had written so far at the time. If I hadn't known that on the front end I would have never guessed that this book was finished by someone else. A friend of mine wrote in her review of this book that it feels like you're sitting down and having a conversation with a friend and I completely agree with that assessment. This is more a collection of essays about what Wholehearted Faith might look like or what it looks like to Rachel Held Evans. There are things I don't agree with Evans on, but I absolutely LOVE the way she writes and how she continues to wrestle with her faith even when it's hard and even when she doesn't feel like believing. She is such a great example of real faith and I hate that this is the last book we'll ever get from her.
Some quotes I liked:
"Wholeheartedness means that we can be doubtful and still find rest in the tender embrace of a God who isn't threatened by human inconsistency. Wholeheartedness means that we can ask bold questions, knowing that God loves us not just in spite of them but also because of them - and because of this searching, seeking spirits that inspire us to want to know God more deeply. Wholeheartedness means that we can approach the throne of grace in the confidence of the God who made us, the God who redeemed us, and the God who accompanies us." (p. 38-39)
"Anyway, most of the openhearted wanderers I've encountered are looking not for a bulletproof belief system but for a community of friends, not for a spiritual encyclopedia that contains every answer but for a gathering of loved ones in which they can ask the hard questions." (p. 53)
"There's a common misunderstanding among many Christians that God is equal parts love and wrath, and the trick is to strike a theological balance between the two. But the Bible doesn't teach this. The Bible teaches that God's entire essence is love." (p. 87)
"One of the reasons I'm still a Christian is that this faith liberates me from a fear of death. In doing so, it delves into one of the deepest receptacles of human fear, looks it in the eye, and declares, 'I am not afraid.' I am not afraid to name the things that are bringing death to the people I love and calling them wrong. I am not afraid to say that the church has stifled holy imagination for the sake of the preservation of its own comfort...I am not afraid to say that, if the church in the US is dying, let it die. Let it die to the old ways of hegemony. Let it die to violence. Let it die to control. Maybe the church in the US is already dead. But the fear of death is the province of those who do not believe in resurrection. Aren't Christians supposed to be living testimony to the miracle of the resurrection?"101-102)
"This is one of the things I've been missing in many contemporary articulations of Christianity - a raw, unadorned expression of how much things can truly suck. There is no judgement, at least not as we think of it. There is no condemnation of the psalmist's wallowing, no admonition that he ought to be something other than what he is or feel something other than what he feels. There is no patronizing suggestion that this is all part of God's plan." (p. 148-49)
Some quotes I liked:
"Wholeheartedness means that we can be doubtful and still find rest in the tender embrace of a God who isn't threatened by human inconsistency. Wholeheartedness means that we can ask bold questions, knowing that God loves us not just in spite of them but also because of them - and because of this searching, seeking spirits that inspire us to want to know God more deeply. Wholeheartedness means that we can approach the throne of grace in the confidence of the God who made us, the God who redeemed us, and the God who accompanies us." (p. 38-39)
"Anyway, most of the openhearted wanderers I've encountered are looking not for a bulletproof belief system but for a community of friends, not for a spiritual encyclopedia that contains every answer but for a gathering of loved ones in which they can ask the hard questions." (p. 53)
"There's a common misunderstanding among many Christians that God is equal parts love and wrath, and the trick is to strike a theological balance between the two. But the Bible doesn't teach this. The Bible teaches that God's entire essence is love." (p. 87)
"One of the reasons I'm still a Christian is that this faith liberates me from a fear of death. In doing so, it delves into one of the deepest receptacles of human fear, looks it in the eye, and declares, 'I am not afraid.' I am not afraid to name the things that are bringing death to the people I love and calling them wrong. I am not afraid to say that the church has stifled holy imagination for the sake of the preservation of its own comfort...I am not afraid to say that, if the church in the US is dying, let it die. Let it die to the old ways of hegemony. Let it die to violence. Let it die to control. Maybe the church in the US is already dead. But the fear of death is the province of those who do not believe in resurrection. Aren't Christians supposed to be living testimony to the miracle of the resurrection?"101-102)
"This is one of the things I've been missing in many contemporary articulations of Christianity - a raw, unadorned expression of how much things can truly suck. There is no judgement, at least not as we think of it. There is no condemnation of the psalmist's wallowing, no admonition that he ought to be something other than what he is or feel something other than what he feels. There is no patronizing suggestion that this is all part of God's plan." (p. 148-49)
How (Not) to Read the Bible by Dan Kimball
I wasn't really sure what to expect with this book, but was drawn to check it out solely based on the title. And I'm glad I did because it was AMAZING. Dan Kimball you are one of my new heroes. In this book Kimball explores 5 areas of "crazy" things found in the Bible - weird Old Testament laws, misogyny in the Bible, the Bible vs. science, the claim that Christianity is the only path to God, and violence in the Bible. The first section of the book explains in further detail the importance of reading the Bible "correctly" which really means how it was originally intended. One quote he says a lot that I very much appreciate is that "The Bible is written for us, but not to us." Basically, as a Christian the Bible is for us, but it's not meant to be an explanation of every question for all of time. Kimball does a really, really good job of breaking things down and explaining the historical context of the different books of the Bible and how we can use these books today as Christians. It's all very common sense, but sadly many people don't have any common sense and want the Bible to be a literal roadmap for our lives or want to apply everything in it in a literal way and that is just not how it was written or how we are supposed to use it. I'm not a Biblical scholar, but I do read a LOT about a lot of things and I was beyond impressed with this book. This is one I am definitely going to buy!
Some quotes I liked:
"I love that the Bible itself says that some of the Bible will be hard to understand. So when we struggle with something in the Bible, we have to remember that even Peter admitted that not all of it is easy to understand. It also says that people will 'distort' the Bible. This reaffirms what we've been learning, that it is critically important to invest time and effort into understanding how to and how not to read and study the Bible." (p. 33)
"In general, Jesus did not focus on specific civil laws or governments, but addressed the desires and motives of the human heart." (p. 98)
"Overall, the world that Jesus lived in and the world the church was born into did not have equal respect, value, and rights for men and women. So when we read what Jesus did with regard to women, it should be recognized as countercultural, highly shocking, and extremely challenging to the religious leaders of his day. We see Jesus striving to change the culture he lived in through the way he treated women - with respect, dignity, and equality." (p. 121)
"Jesus could have appeared to anyone after his resurrection, but he chose to reveal himself first to women...According to Jewish law, women were not allowed to bear legal witness. Yet Jesus gave them the honorable task of being the very first to see him resurrected and the very first to tell others about it." (p. 124)
"Every time we see a list of gifts that God's Spirit gave to enable the church to function on mission, we see no distinction made between men and women. We never see in these lists of what we call 'spiritual gifts' in the New Testament that only certain gifts were for men and some were only for women. Read those lists and you will not see any such labeling." (p. 127)
"Dr. Rodney Stark, a sociologist, writes in his book The Rise of Christianity that 'Christianity was unusually appealing [to women] because within the Christian subculture women enjoyed far higher status than did women in the Greco-Roman world at large.' He notes that the early church 'attracted an unusual number of higher-status women.' Has the church throughout the ages used certain Bible verses against women in wrong, even harmful ways? Sadly, yes. There have been - and still are - some churches and Christians who misuse the text to create misogyny in God's name. But when you study the Scriptures and seek to understand them in their cultural context, it's clear that the Bible is not against women, but an advocate for women." (p. 147)
"God punished Egypt with a series of ten plagues to knock down the arrogance and confidence of Pharaoh, the Egyptian leader, and force him to release Israel from slavery. The plagues God chose were not random events - they were quite intentional. Each of the ten plagues was a direct assault on one of the gods of the Egyptians. For example, Egyptians worshiped the god Hapi, the Egyptian God of the Nile River, and it was believed that the god Osiris had the Nile River as his bloodstream. God demonstrated his power over the river - and the Egyptian gods - by turning the river water blood red." (p. 167)
Some quotes I liked:
"I love that the Bible itself says that some of the Bible will be hard to understand. So when we struggle with something in the Bible, we have to remember that even Peter admitted that not all of it is easy to understand. It also says that people will 'distort' the Bible. This reaffirms what we've been learning, that it is critically important to invest time and effort into understanding how to and how not to read and study the Bible." (p. 33)
"In general, Jesus did not focus on specific civil laws or governments, but addressed the desires and motives of the human heart." (p. 98)
"Overall, the world that Jesus lived in and the world the church was born into did not have equal respect, value, and rights for men and women. So when we read what Jesus did with regard to women, it should be recognized as countercultural, highly shocking, and extremely challenging to the religious leaders of his day. We see Jesus striving to change the culture he lived in through the way he treated women - with respect, dignity, and equality." (p. 121)
"Jesus could have appeared to anyone after his resurrection, but he chose to reveal himself first to women...According to Jewish law, women were not allowed to bear legal witness. Yet Jesus gave them the honorable task of being the very first to see him resurrected and the very first to tell others about it." (p. 124)
"Every time we see a list of gifts that God's Spirit gave to enable the church to function on mission, we see no distinction made between men and women. We never see in these lists of what we call 'spiritual gifts' in the New Testament that only certain gifts were for men and some were only for women. Read those lists and you will not see any such labeling." (p. 127)
"Dr. Rodney Stark, a sociologist, writes in his book The Rise of Christianity that 'Christianity was unusually appealing [to women] because within the Christian subculture women enjoyed far higher status than did women in the Greco-Roman world at large.' He notes that the early church 'attracted an unusual number of higher-status women.' Has the church throughout the ages used certain Bible verses against women in wrong, even harmful ways? Sadly, yes. There have been - and still are - some churches and Christians who misuse the text to create misogyny in God's name. But when you study the Scriptures and seek to understand them in their cultural context, it's clear that the Bible is not against women, but an advocate for women." (p. 147)
"God punished Egypt with a series of ten plagues to knock down the arrogance and confidence of Pharaoh, the Egyptian leader, and force him to release Israel from slavery. The plagues God chose were not random events - they were quite intentional. Each of the ten plagues was a direct assault on one of the gods of the Egyptians. For example, Egyptians worshiped the god Hapi, the Egyptian God of the Nile River, and it was believed that the god Osiris had the Nile River as his bloodstream. God demonstrated his power over the river - and the Egyptian gods - by turning the river water blood red." (p. 167)
Bad Blood: secrets and lies in a silicon valley startup by John Carreyrou
Elizabeth Holmes was pegged as "the next Steve Jobs" while working to start her company Theranos. Holmes claimed that Theranos would revolutionize the medical testing world by being able to run hundreds of tests on just a few drops of blood. The only problem? The technology she claimed to have didn't work or really exist. But that didn't stop her from lying to everyone from venture capitalists to Generals in the US military to bully her way into selling Theranos devices. The company basically ran on red flags from the very beginning and fired anyone who dared ask a question or doubted what the company was doing leaving an insanely long trail of former employees in it's wake. Holmes also had no problem suing or threatening former or current employees with lawsuits if there was even a whiff of a breach of the many confidentiality documents they had to sign to work there or quit. When a few brave former employees did start whistleblowing Theranos came down on them HARD. And when the story was eventually told through The Wall Street Journal Theranos fought the newspaper just as hard, but thankfully the paper was more prepared and stood by their journalist John Carreyrou. Within two years of the first article exposing the fraud at Theranos the former "unicorn" of Silicon Valley was done. But, the damage was done especially for many of the former employees - especially one awful case where the employee committed suicide. At the time of the book publication no criminal charges had been filed, but since then both Elizabeth Holmes and her business partner and former boyfriend, Ramesh "Sunny" Balwani, both were indicted on criminal fraud charges.
I remember when the Theranos fraud story first came out, but I didn't read too much about it at the time. When I finally picked up this book I was hooked from the first chapter. I don't know how a company literally made out of red flags EVER got as far as it did. It really makes you wonder about the process for getting funding for a start up company because NO ONE who gave money seemed to do any kind of research or required anything from her other than verbal assurances. Can someone give me $10 million dollars because I'm confident and a good speaker? I'm also curious in cases like this did Holmes intend to defraud people and lie? Or did she truly think she could make this idea work and when it was increasingly obvious it never would she just kept hoping that if they could get more money somehow it would miraculously work? I was also blown away by the insanely toxic work environment at Theranos. She blew through employees like kleenex - and these weren't unskilled Walmart cashiers, they were top of their fields scientists and engineers who were literally fired on the spot for asking obvious questions. Carreyrou does a great job with this story and it reads more like a spy/thriller movie than a non-fiction book about the rise and fall of Theranos.
Some quotes I liked:
"It was all beginning to make sense: Holmes and her company had overpromised and then cut corners when they couldn't deliver. It was one thing to do that with software or a smartphone app, but doing it with a medical product that people relied on to make important health decisions was unconscionable." (p. 229)
"Balwani had tasked a Theranos software engineer named Michael Craig to write an application for the miniLab's software that masked test malfunctions. When something went wrong inside the machine, the app kicked in and prevented an error message from appearing on the digital display. Instead, the screen showed the test's progress slowing to a crawl." (p. 262)
I remember when the Theranos fraud story first came out, but I didn't read too much about it at the time. When I finally picked up this book I was hooked from the first chapter. I don't know how a company literally made out of red flags EVER got as far as it did. It really makes you wonder about the process for getting funding for a start up company because NO ONE who gave money seemed to do any kind of research or required anything from her other than verbal assurances. Can someone give me $10 million dollars because I'm confident and a good speaker? I'm also curious in cases like this did Holmes intend to defraud people and lie? Or did she truly think she could make this idea work and when it was increasingly obvious it never would she just kept hoping that if they could get more money somehow it would miraculously work? I was also blown away by the insanely toxic work environment at Theranos. She blew through employees like kleenex - and these weren't unskilled Walmart cashiers, they were top of their fields scientists and engineers who were literally fired on the spot for asking obvious questions. Carreyrou does a great job with this story and it reads more like a spy/thriller movie than a non-fiction book about the rise and fall of Theranos.
Some quotes I liked:
"It was all beginning to make sense: Holmes and her company had overpromised and then cut corners when they couldn't deliver. It was one thing to do that with software or a smartphone app, but doing it with a medical product that people relied on to make important health decisions was unconscionable." (p. 229)
"Balwani had tasked a Theranos software engineer named Michael Craig to write an application for the miniLab's software that masked test malfunctions. When something went wrong inside the machine, the app kicked in and prevented an error message from appearing on the digital display. Instead, the screen showed the test's progress slowing to a crawl." (p. 262)
Beautiful Country by Qian Julie Wang
When Qian was seven she and her mother moved from China to America to join her father who had left three years earlier. In China Qian's parents were professionals and they lived a comfortable life, but in America they are reduced to working in a variety of sweatshops and low-end jobs. Qian is thrust into American public school speaking no English and with basically no help from the school. She's transferred to the "special needs" classroom where she teaches herself to read English. Even once she's proficient in English she is always doing the wrong thing and not understanding American cultural norms. Her parents struggle even more with having to work menial labor jobs for pennies when they are both highly educated. The years Qian is in New York City are years of contradictions - America is the "beautiful country," but the family is almost starving and barely scraping by. Qian struggles to fit in, but finds enormous comfort in reading and the public library. Her family moved to America with hope for a better future, but they are also afraid of standing out too much and possibly being deported. Eventually, the family is able to move to Canada and legally obtain citizenship and Qian realizes her dream of becoming a lawyer. But, her traumatic childhood and dysfunctional family scars still threaten her. This book is the product of her working through her childhood and finally reconciling her past with her present and future. An incredible memoir that will make you thankful for everything you have.
Some quotes I liked:
"'Qian.' He was holding the essay from the day before. 'Did you write this?' Was it a trick question? Maybe it was another question that was actually an answer. 'I don't think you wrote this, Qian.' Maybe it was one of those jokes he loved to make but that no one got. 'Then who did?' I squeaked out. 'This is...this is not the type of writing I see at PS 124.' 'But I did write it.' 'Are you sure?'...It was the first of many similar encounters I would have with white teachers to come. For the rest of my time in Mr. Kane's class, I made sure to add spelling and grammatical mistakes before handing anything in." (p. 201-2)
"Male teachers, I had learned by then, were rarely impressed with stories about girls. Mr. Kane was always telling me to read something more worthwhile, like Hatchet. But I didn't understand why a boy's stories about growing up were more worthwhile than a girl's." (p. 243)
Some quotes I liked:
"'Qian.' He was holding the essay from the day before. 'Did you write this?' Was it a trick question? Maybe it was another question that was actually an answer. 'I don't think you wrote this, Qian.' Maybe it was one of those jokes he loved to make but that no one got. 'Then who did?' I squeaked out. 'This is...this is not the type of writing I see at PS 124.' 'But I did write it.' 'Are you sure?'...It was the first of many similar encounters I would have with white teachers to come. For the rest of my time in Mr. Kane's class, I made sure to add spelling and grammatical mistakes before handing anything in." (p. 201-2)
"Male teachers, I had learned by then, were rarely impressed with stories about girls. Mr. Kane was always telling me to read something more worthwhile, like Hatchet. But I didn't understand why a boy's stories about growing up were more worthwhile than a girl's." (p. 243)
Sourdough Culture by Eric Pallant
In 1988 Eric Pallant was given some sourdough starter from a colleague who said that starter dated back to the Cripple Creek gold rush from 1893. In the early 2000's Pallant had been using the starter continually and suddenly thought about how that starter had been with him longer than his children. He wondered if he could verify the origins of his starter. He also began to wonder about how sourdough bread started in human civilization and how it migrated from those origins to his gold rush starter in Colorado in 1893. Those questions led to this book that is as Peter Reinhart writes in the Foreword: "Eric's book invites us to ride along and see how scientists, theologians, laborers, bakers, soldiers, and bread lovers have interacted with sourdough since the dawn of Western civilization." (p. xii) While at times the level of scientific and historical details are high, the book is still very readable from a non-scientist/historian viewpoint. I was also pretty impressed overall with Pallant's drive to know EVERYTHING about sourdough bread. Each chapter offers a few recipes related to the contents of that chapter. Overall, definitely an interesting book especially if you're a bread baker or interested in baking your own bread.
A quote I liked:
"In the 1960s, when Wonder Bread reigned in America, sourdough bread was a form of protest - as was, come to think of it, simply baking a loaf at home." (p. 233)
A quote I liked:
"In the 1960s, when Wonder Bread reigned in America, sourdough bread was a form of protest - as was, come to think of it, simply baking a loaf at home." (p. 233)
Food Saved Me by Danielle Walker
I might be one of the few people to read this book who is not suffering from an autoimmune disease. I picked it up based on the title because I'm a huge proponent of eating real food. While I don't have any autoimmune diseases, I did find that when I changed my diet in 2010 I didn't get sick nearly as much as I did before. I cut out most processed foods, fast food, and any meat or eggs not local and regeneratively farmed/raised. I also learned to cook from scratch more and can my own produce - both of which used to be normal household skills, but not something most people do today. I was impressed with Danielle's story and her transparency about her struggles. I honestly can't imagine being that sick and also not always knowing what would trigger a flare up. I wasn't really familiar with her before this book, but I had heard of the cookbook Against All Grain. The book was definitely interesting and engaging even for someone without the types of health issues she has. It still blows my mind how many doctors tell people that illness/disease IN THEIR DIGESTIVE TRACT don't have anything to do with food - it shows how far removed we are from the importance of food/diet/health in our country. Overall, a well-written and inspirational book about the power of food.
Some quotes I liked:
"After consulting with two GI specialists and undergoing a battery of scans, biopsies, and blood tests in some of the most sophisticated medical facilities in the Bay Are, who would have guessed that the most thorough explanation of what I had and how I might have gotten it would come from a doctor in a dilapidated two-room hospital in the middle of a developing country." (p. 54-55)
"I couldn't quite make sense of what he was telling me. If it didn't matter what I ate, why had two different GI specialists specifically instructed me to eat totally different things? Dr. Stark had also said that the way food is grown and prepared can affect the body. Dr. Benedict just prescribed fish oil and potassium supplements - but weren't those two nutrients I could get by eating actual fish or bananas? Given that my particular disease involved the colon, where food is digested...weren't they all making the case that food does in fact play a role?" (p. 69)
Some quotes I liked:
"After consulting with two GI specialists and undergoing a battery of scans, biopsies, and blood tests in some of the most sophisticated medical facilities in the Bay Are, who would have guessed that the most thorough explanation of what I had and how I might have gotten it would come from a doctor in a dilapidated two-room hospital in the middle of a developing country." (p. 54-55)
"I couldn't quite make sense of what he was telling me. If it didn't matter what I ate, why had two different GI specialists specifically instructed me to eat totally different things? Dr. Stark had also said that the way food is grown and prepared can affect the body. Dr. Benedict just prescribed fish oil and potassium supplements - but weren't those two nutrients I could get by eating actual fish or bananas? Given that my particular disease involved the colon, where food is digested...weren't they all making the case that food does in fact play a role?" (p. 69)