Plaid Cats Librarian
Thursday, February 19, 2026
January 2026 Cookbook Reviews
January 2026 Reviews
Every page of this book is quoteable, but here a few that stood out even more:
"Most people think ants are strong for their size, but earthworms are arguably the ultimate strength creature. Weighing only 1/30th of an ounce, they routinely move 2 ounce stones, equivalent of a 150-pound person moving a 9,000 pound stone." (p. 57)
"The point here is to enjoy your homestead more than seeing it as something to conquer in a week. Emotional energy drives physical energy, and if we're constantly depressed because we feel like our pace is not fast enough, we'll miss the greatest joy of homesteading, which is seeing progress toward unorthodoxy. The homestead tribe is one that bucks every accepted norm in society." (p. 157-158) [This is my all time favorite Joel Salatin quote - are you progressing toward unorthodoxy?]
"When our minds become preoccupied with societal disturbance and worry, a walk amidst our handiwork is a balm for the soul. A change here, a new activity there, and suddenly the landscape responds with a tree, a mushroom, a luxuriant patch of red clover. The landscape carries on." (p. 230)
I had never heard of this book but it was listed in a recent book I read, World of Wonders that compiled 80 children's books that have had a lasting impact on readers. The Mouse and His Child was written in 1967 and is an odd book. It almost reminded me of a combination of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and The Velveteen Rabbit but with tin toys and animals living in and around a dump. I'm not sure what children would make of this one. There are some interesting storylines and the hope the Mouse Child has and Manny Rat's turn from evil to good are the two best parts for me. It is an odd book but I am glad that I read it.
Some quotes I liked:
"The animals and birds paid their acorns, beechnuts, seeds, and grubs, along with turnips and dead beetles saved for the occasion, and were ushered by the starlings to their places, where they combined sniffs, growls, whines, and twitters in the general murmur of an audience waiting for an entertainment to begin." (p. 82)
[Inside Muskrat's den] "A little group of firefly students had lit up when the muskrat's familiar step was heard in the tunnel, and now they said in unison, 'Good morning, sir.' Devoted followers who had outstayed the summer, they lived in a glass jar in a corner, and their dormitory cast its pale and blinking glow on the clutter all around them." (p. 108)
"The elephant was completely overwhelmed. Until now she had thought only of herself and the injustice done her; the child and the father had been nothing to her. But now into her one glass eye there rushed a picture in its wholeness of the foggy day, the steaming snow, the black trees, the tired father, the tiny, lost, and hopeful child. A world of love and pain was printed on her vision, never to be gone again." (p. 127-128)
"The house's character had changed much with the fire that had wrecked it and the several stages of reconstruction that renewed it; phoenixlike, the place seemed reborn of itself." (p. 211)
I had never heard of this book but it was listed in a recent book I read, World of Wonders that compiled 80 children's books that have had a lasting impact on readers. I had also never seen a wordless graphic novel before. I love wordless picture books, but this is my first wordless graphic novel. I can definitely see why this was included in World of Wonders.
The book was interesting, particularly the sections that talked about the Roman culture of that day. I do agree with some of the reviews I read that this does read almost like a thesis and is very scholarly and not a super easy read especially if you're not somewhat versed on this subject and the Bible overall. I'm a staunch egalitarian and to me it's obvious in how Jesus interacted with women (and the fact that He DID interact with women at all) that He doesn't view women as lesser or beneath men. And again, the fact that women are mentioned at all in the New Testament shows that they were involved and in more than just cooking and childcare. Gupta brings up some good points and it's definitely worth thinking about for any Christian how much interpretation there is when translating the Bible into English or other languages from the original. Overall, I liked the book but I think it probably has a more narrow audience.
Some quotes I liked:
"Sometimes the question is raised whether God used Deborah only because there were no men available, or because Barak had weak faith. But if we look at the judges as a whole, especially Gideon and Samson, it is clear that they were not chosen for their virtue or strong faith." (p. 14)
"Another important conversation Jesus has with a woman happens at the Sycharian well in Samaria. In popular modern reflections on this story, this unnamed Samaritan woman is often depicted as a sexually immoral person that Jesus calls out. But that is read into the text; nothing like that is ever stated in John...They get into the topic of her family life. She has had five husbands and now does not live with a husband. In our modern minds, we quickly jump to her having a string of divorces and is now shacking up with yet another man. But another scenario is possible, even more probable. Her husbands have died, not uncommon in a world with high mortality, and she very well could be living with her brother or another male relative. In that case, Jesus was not calling her out on her promiscuity; he was attentive to her hard life." (p. 59-60)
Saturday, February 14, 2026
2025 Year of Reading
In 2025 I read 70 books (goal was 75 so I got close) and 32 cookbooks. Here are my Top 10, Top 5 Cookbooks, and Worst 5:
Top 10 Books Read in 2025
When Southern Women Cook by America's Test Kitchen
Becoming the Pastor's Wife by Beth Allison Barr
A Life in the Garden by Barbara Damrosch
Dodge County, Incorporated by Sonja Trom Eayrs
Sociopath by Patric Gagne
Seeking Shelter by Jeff Hobbs
The Secret History of the Rape Kit by Pagan Kennedy
Demon Copperhead by Barbara Kingsolver
We All Live Here by Jojo Moyes
The Owl Handbook by John Sheway
Top 5 Cookbooks
When Southern Women Cook by America's Test Kitchen
Preserving the Seasons by Holly Capella
The Garlic Companion by Kristin Graves
3 Doughs, 60 Recipes by Lacey Ostermann
The Cook's Garden by Kevin West
Worst 5 Books of 2025
End of Story by A.J. Finn
Spare by Prince Harry
Portrait of a Thief by Grace Li
Lula Dean's Little Library of Banned Books by Kirsten Miller
Care and Feeding by Laurie Woolever
December 2025 Reviews
Some quotes I liked:
"Murphy-Geiss quotes the aphorism that 'marriage is as much a requirement for Protestant ministry as celibacy is for the Catholic priesthood.' She also cites a 2008 finding that 94 percent of 'all Protestant clergy in the United States are married, and, unlike most other professions, the pastor's family is often involved in his/her work.' And marriage seems to be on the rise for Protestant clergy, as a 2017 Barna Group study found that 96 percent were married. These trends and persistent attitudes mean that the pastor's role is by design a two-person job in which only one person receives a salary, title, and official position. For a pastor's wife, especially one in the American evangelical tradition, the very nature of her husband's calling presumes her supportive and unpaid labor. He literally can't do it without her." (p. xiv - xv)
"We have taken a position [pastor's wife] never mentioned directly in Scripture and turned it into the highest ministry calling for contemporary evangelical women, allowing it to supplant other ministry roles. We have pressured women who do not feel called to ministry into ministry service because of their husbands' vocations. We have told women that their best path to ministry is literally to follow behind men." (p. 21)
"The problem isn't what these women were doing. The problem is what we call the work these women were doing. Milburga's world called her an abbess. Bertha Smith's world called her a missionary. Kathy Hoppe's world called her a minister's wife. I can't help but thinking about Elizabeth Marvel's words about women's ordination in the modern global church. 'Ordination has less to do with what an individual can or cannot do in the church,' she writes, 'and more to do with the power or prestige assigned to their position while doing it.' I think she is right. History suggests that ordination has less to do with the work of ministry and more to do with how that work is recognized." (p. 66-67)
"[Elizabeth] Flower's book Into the Pulpit provides an in-depth analysis of the SBC [Southern Baptist Convention] gender wars and their connection to broader American culture. In her chapter focused on the 1970s, Flowers shows how SBC concerns about female autonomy and independent leadership roles coincided with increasing agency for women...it was only in the 1960s and '70s that women in the US gained legal protections against wage discrimination, credit discrimination, sexual harassment, and gender discrimination within the workplace. They also gained legal access to birth control and abortion." (p. 138)
While it's clear in the book description that this book is satire, I did not like it. I'm a public librarian so obviously I'm against book banning. And I get that most of the characters were purposely caricatures, but the heavy handedness of the message got old FAST. I mean how many times was it mentioned that Lula Dean had orange hair - COME ON. It was also unnecessarily vulgar in my opinion. And there were WAY too many characters. She could have cut the character list in half and still almost had too many. I do think book banning is a topic worth discussing, but no one on "the other side" of this issue would read this book and change their mind. I did like the DNA storyline of the Black family finding out they were ancestors of the town Confederate hero - that was well done and brought up a known issue in a more natural way. Overall, I didn't like it at all. The writing was good and despite not really liking it I did want to find out what happened in the end with everyone. But I wouldn't recommend this one.
The plot of this book is based on real historical events - two giraffes that survive a hurricane and are driven across the US to the San Diego Zoo. The rest of the story and the characters are built around this event. I liked all three main characters and in the beginning I was really liking the book. But it was somehow both monotonous and ridiculously over the top at the same time. Every day was get up tend the giraffes, stop, run into some trouble, get out of said trouble, stop for the night and then rinse and repeat the next day. Yes, I can imagine there would be trouble along the way and some of the trouble they encounter seems likely. Some of the trouble was so ridiculous that it seemed a stretch even for fiction. The further the book went the more ridiculous a lot of stuff became until I wasn't really liking the book anymore. I think this could have been an amazing book but it was a little too Kristin Hannah-eque for me - like every possible thing that could go wrong for these people and the giraffes did over and over. I would have quit reading if not for my book club reading this one.
I agree with some of the reviews that I read that the book is a little repetitive. Each chapter tells the story of someone who's been conned that Walton helped and part of his own story of being conned by Mair Smyth. So there is a lot of reiteration around the red flags in each chapter. And honestly, any one of the red flags he talks about alone wouldn't be enough to be suspicious. But these red flags together or combined with other gut feelings or logic-defying situations could point to a con artist. The biggest downfall of honest people is that you assume other people are honest as well - and con artists count on that. This book wasn't amazing, but it was interesting and I definitely admire the lengths Walton went to to get Mair Smyth prosecuted and to help other victims.
Some quotes I liked:
[Black Beauty by Anna Sewell] "One Texas cowpuncher arraigned for ill-treating his pony would be sentenced to one month's imprisonment where he was required to read the story three times." (p. 34-35)
[Mary Poppins by P.L. Travers] "P.L. Travers fought hard against the changes to her story that she saw in the Disney film - ultimately, she lost. She was so unhappy with the way she and her novel were treated that she ruled out any further adaptations." (p. 94) [There were 8 books in the Mary Poppins series]
[Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl] "In 2023, four years after Dahl's death, Puffin books announced that they would be revising all of his texts to eliminate derogatory words and passages. In the new version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Augustus Gloop is now described as 'enormous' rather than 'fat,' and the Oompa-Loompas go from being 'tiny' to 'small.' Elsewhere, references to glass eyes, ugliness, old age, disability, and other potentially sensitive topics were removed or altered. Arguments about censorship swiftly broke out, even getting as far as the U.K.'s House of Commons. But Puffin Books' decision to re-issue the original texts in The Roald Dahl Classic Collection finally left readers free to choose whichever version they wanted." (p. 159)
[A quote from the text of Watership Down by Richard Adams] "Animals don't behave like men," he said. "If they have to fight, they fight; and if they have to kill they kill. But they don't sit down and set their wits to work to devise ways of spoiling other creatures' lives and hurting them. They have dignity and animality." (p. 173)
[The Neverending Story by Michael Ende] "Michael Ende disliked the 1984 film adaptation of his novel so intensely that he launched legal action that delayed the release of the sequel until 1990." (p. 184)
[The Story of a Seagull and the Cat Who Taught Her to Fly by Luis Sepulveda] "In Sepulveda's imagination, cats not only understand the language of humans but can speak it - though it's the ultimate taboo to let humans in on that little secret...'Cats were aware, of course, of the sad fate of the dolphins, who had displayed their intelligence to humans who had in turn condemned the dolphins to acting like clowns in aquatic spectacles.'" (p. 206)
Friday, December 12, 2025
November 2025 Cookbook Reviews
November 2025 Reviews
Some cases that stood out to me:
p. 111 Constance Fisher of Maine suffering from postpartum depression killed her 3 children and tried to commit suicide in 1954. She was sent to a mental hospital and when she was released five years later her husband took her back. They had 3 more children. Then in 1966 she killed those 3 children and again attempted suicide. She was again sent to a mental hospital and a few years later escaped and succeeded in committing suicide. It was like a precursor to Andrea Yates but TWICE.
p. 271 I did not know that Frank Lloyd Wright abandoned his family and ran off to Europe with his mistress. When he came back to the US he started building a "bungalow of love" for them in Wisconsin. While he was away on business one of the workers building the house killed his lover, her children, and several other workers and set the house on fire.
This is the classic Jojo Moyes that I LOVE! I'm always amazed at how her books weave in so many people and plotlines that all come together to create an amazing story that you didn't expect. This is a beautiful story about the meaning of family and finding love in unexpected places.
Some quotes I liked:
"When Marty couldn't find any conventional support for her rape-kit pilot program, she turned to her friend Margaret. 'I decided we had to put aside our feelings for objectification of women in [Playboy] magazine,' Marty later said. She applied for a donation of $10,000 from the Playboy Foundation - the equivalent of more than $50,000 today. She got it...In 1978, Marty Goddard delivered standardized rape kits to twenty-five hospitals in the Chicago area for use in the pilot program she had designed..." (p. 58-59)
"'For years, there's been a misconception that people who commit [sexual] offenses are two types of people: stranger rapists or acquaintance rapists, and they don't cross over,' a victim advocate named Colleen Phelan told a reporter in 2021. The new rape-kit evidence data confirmed that this idea had been wrong all along: the same man's DNA might show up in his girlfriend's rape kit and in a kit belonging to a child whom he'd grabbed off the street. In some cases, DNA results revealed that perpetrators have sexually assaulted people of different ages and genders. As the Tucson Police Department analyzed the results from its backlog, a new picture emerged of the serial rapist as a 'generalist' who attacked strangers, acquaintances, and family members. 'Their MO is vulnerable people,' Phelan said." (p. 145)
"Chillingly, two-thirds of serial rapists had never been arrested for sexual assault before the backlogged evidence was tested, even though some of them had been active for years. That 'is an indicator as to just how much undetected sexual offending there is,' Lovell told a reporter in 2020. It was also an indication of just how little police departments had done to prevent it." (p. 147-148)
"Black women, many of whom were in communities that have been shattered by police brutality, continued to be less inclined than other groups to seek help from forensic nurses or the criminal justice system. For every one Black survivor who reported a sexual assault, there were fifteen others who decided not to do so, a U.S. Justice Department study found in 2003." (p. 160)
"Even if the patient was spattered with blood and shivering with fear, she would be forced to wait, sometimes all day, before anyone attended to her. 'I don't think any of the victims ever waited for less than eight hours,' Waegemann said, 'and that's not including the rape-kit exam.' [that can take up to 5 hours on its own...]" (p. 162) [Then people wonder why women don't go to the police or hospital after a sexual assault...]
I'm in the minority here in that I didn't really like this book. I didn't know who she was before finding this book and I don't follow her on Instagram. Maybe if I was familiar with her, I would have anticipated her writing style more. Her foraging tips seem solid, but the overall book seemed all over the place to me. The book is organized seasonally with both foraging tips and recipes, but it's mostly stories of her personal foraging experiences. Her personal stories were written like the reader knows more backstory than we're given. They often seem to pick up in the middle of a situation or story that we don't know about so a lot of them felt kind of random or like you don't have enough information. There were also a couple chapters where one story was broken up throughout the chapter with other stories from different time periods mixed in which was confusing. Some of her foraging stories I enjoyed, some I did not. Many felt like she was trying a little too hard to be a hippie/Earth goddess type persona. Overall, I didn't love the book, but I do like that she is trying to bring more attention to foraging all year long.
Friday, October 31, 2025
October 2025 Cookbook Reviews