Tuesday, May 2, 2023

April 2023 Cookbook Reviews

 



The Everlasting Meal Cookbook: leftovers A-Z by Tamar Adler

Tamar Adler's goal is cooking with absolutely NO WASTE. This book is organized by type of food - vegetables, bread, beans & rice, meat, etc. and then within each section it's organized alphabetically with ideas for what to do with that leftover item. Each section starts off with a short food related essay, although not always about the topic of that section. I'm all about leftovers and not wasting food. When you're growing your own food you're even less likely to waste it because you know all the work and effort that went into growing it firsthand! But, some of her ideas seems ridiculous - repurposing leftover cupcakes? Is that a thing - having leftover cupcakes? I think instead of encouraging eating leftovers and repurposing odd and ends this cookbook feels more like you need to repurpose every part of every leftover into something new. I'm all about eating leftovers, but that's because I don't want to cook every night. Overall, it's a unique idea but I don't know how practical it is especially for a newer cook.

 



April 2023 Reviews

 


Reason to Return: why women need the church and the church needs women by Ericka Andersen

Women (and people in general) are leaving the Church at an all time high in the past few years. Ericka Anderson makes the case for why it's important, specifically for women, to come back. The book is divided into three sections - the reasons we leave, reasons to reconsider, and a call worth pursuing. Anderson does a great job of making her case without being condescending or shaming. And while I agree with her 100% the reality can be much harder. As a Christian woman who's chosen to not have children I've often felt like an outsider at church. I'm also an introvert which makes making friends much harder as I've gotten older and also makes the "join a serving team to meet people" harder too. But, I agree it's still worth it. Now, here's hoping I can find the right church for me sometime before Jesus returns!

Some quotes I liked:

"The Church and the local church are not about a day of the week or a building to walk into but about a people and a way of life. 'People don't enter a church; the church enters a building,' writes [Sam] Allberry." (p. 13)

"The 2016 election year seemed to put faith in the spotlight like none before. As one woman put it, the experiences with friends and family 'ground me into dust spiritually.'" (p. 87)

"After the atomic bombs were dropped near the end of World War II, C. S. Lewis wrote...If we are all going to be destroyed by an atomic bomb, let that bomb when it comes find us doing sensible and human things - praying, working, teaching, reading, listening to music, bathing the children, playing tennis, chatting to our friends over a pint and a game of darts - not huddled together like frightened sheep and thinking about bombs. They may break our bodies (a microbe can do that) but they need not dominate our minds." (p. 199)


The Sentence by Louise Erdrich (Books & Banter book club)

Let me start off by saying I am just not a Louise Erdrich fan. That's not to say she's not a talented author, but her style is just not for me. All of the books I've read by her have been for book clubs and outside of The Birchbark House (her children's book response to The Little House on the Prairie series) I haven't liked any of them. They are just WAY too long and detailed and meandering. All of which applied to The Sentence as well. I'm also a public librarian and reading books whether fiction or non-fiction about libraries and book stores is also not my thing. Too close to being at work I guess.

The premise of this book sounds interesting - Tookie, a Native woman who just got out of prison after 10 years, is working at a local bookstore in Minneapolis. The store's most annoying customer dies and starts haunting the store and Tookie tries to figure out why so she can get the ghost to leave. Here are my issues in no particular order:

1) As another review stated Tookie seemed very one dimensional and everything in her life just seemed to happen to her - her crime, her incarceration, her marriage, everything. She didn't seem to have any agency over her life.

2) It seemed really weird to me that Louise Erdrich seemed to put herself and her bookstore into the storyline. Starting out with her book tour for The Night Watchman, although the title is never mentioned. Even using her own name and the name of her actual bookstore.

3) It was WAY too soon to be writing/reading books about COVID. And somehow this is already the second book I've read this year that dealt with it. Also, since the book is set in Minneapolis we have the added drama of the George Floyd murder and subsequent riots. I'm going to need a list of all the books that deal with COVID so I can avoid them in the future.

4) The ghost story gets completely sidetracked with COVID and the George Floyd riots. The book just takes a sudden turn and no more talk of the ghost for a good 1/3 of the book. Then when we get back to the ghost the issue is just suddenly resolved and seemed like an afterthought.

The things I did like - 1) Tookie did grow on me and I really loved her husband Pollux. If Erdrich had killed him off with COVID I would have thrown this book across the room. 2) She is a good writer and did a good job with the many interpretations of the title, The Sentence. That was very clever and well done. But, I still think she could use a stricter editor and not meander all over the place so much.

Some quotes I liked:

"Books contain everything worth knowing except what ultimately matters." (p. 4)

"Pollux was straightening [the eagle feathers] out by stroking the spines on a hot lightbulb...Over and over he drew the feather over the glass. This would only be normal in a Native person's house. The feather gradually straightened. It took a long time...The patience of him, the way he was devoted to that feather, worked on me. Again and again he warmed the feather, bent it the opposite direction, pulled it straight, warmed it again. He seemed the picture of human love. I knew the fan was for me. I knew the feathers actually were me - Tookie - straightened by warmth applied a thousand times." (p. 231)



Feral: losing myself and finding my way in America's National Parks by Emily Pennington

Premise: woman plans out a year-long trip to visit all 62 National Parks and despite setbacks (a breakup, COVID, etc.) learns resilience and self-reliance.

Reality: LOTS of whining and complaining and weird sexual references/scenes

Pennington mentions the book Wild by Cheryl Strayed as some of her inspiration, but this book is no Wild. Pennington ironically started planning this trip after a breakup with the man who inspired her to be adventurous outdoors, "What if I was less in love with David and more in love with the adventures he introduced me to? What if I struck out on my own and planned a yearlong journey across America, solo?" (p. 176) She then proceeds to get into a new relationship not long into the planning and alternately irritated by her boyfriend Adam when he does come along and then desperately lonely and unhappy when he doesn't. I thought after their breakup in chapter 4 or 5 it would get better - but it didn't. The whole book is mostly her drama before, during, and after the break up, being sick (she must have a horrible immune system), being worried about being sick when COVID comes around, and very weird sexual experiences/descriptions/situations that did not help the book AT ALL. I feel like a jerk saying this, but she was just AWFUL. Adam didn't seem like a winner either, but I felt bad for him and how she portrayed him in the book. The parks were often just barely mentioned or glossed over and her obvious disdain for any "tourists" who weren't hardcore hikers/backpackers/etc. was very off putting. Also, if you're going to write a book like this and talk about all the pictures you took it would have been nice to have some color pictures included in the book. There were black and white photos at the beginning of each chapter, but that could have helped bring this book back to what it was supposed to be - a yearlong adventure in the 62 National Parks. Overall, I really wish I had quit reading it when she and Adam were in Alaska or not picked it up at all.

A MUCH better National Parks book is Leave Only Footprints by Conor Knighton.



Forager: field notes for surviving a family cult by Michelle Dowd

Michelle Dowd grew up in a cult called The Field that was in the Angeles National Forest. Her grandfather founded the cult and demanded full submission from everyone. Michelle could see the contradictions between what they were taught and their reality from a young age, but questions were definitely not encouraged so she learned to be very good at listening to try to figure things out for herself. Her parents were beyond neglectful and obviously didn't want to be parents. I guess they had kids because they needed bodies to do more work? The cult also focused heavily on foraging and wilderness survival. Part of their theology was that comfort was bad, so they lived in poverty and often went without food or medical attention. Michelle was diagnosed with an autoimmune disease and spent months in a hospital alone - her father never came and her mother only rarely. There was also some veiled references to sexual abuse she (and I'm assuming other children) experienced. A weird part of their cult was that men were so favored that there were very few women or girls at all (but without women there is no procreation, so I don't know how they expected to keep going with it being 75% men in the cult). It seemed terrifying to be a child around all these teen and young adult men who are all being told men are more important and you have to do anything and everything they tell you to do. As a teenager Michelle starts working on a plan to get out and eventually her survival skills kick in for more than just foraging for wild food, she forages her way out of The Field in back into the real world.

I love a good cult memoir, but I would have liked less about her childhood spent foraging and more about how she left and what she did when she got out. She was SO afraid of getting pregnant, but then shortly after getting out she got married and quickly had four kids. But that's all that's said about that - I want to know more about her life AFTER the cult. Especially how she was with her kids since her own childhood was so lonely and terrible. She definitely didn't have any decent parenting role models. Her whole story just shows how resilient people can be. From a very young age she knew there was more and better out there somewhere even if she had never seen it. Overall, it was interesting but left me wanting to know more.

Some quotes I liked:

"One time, when Danny was three, he started falling asleep in the aisle and Grandpa kicked him in the head with his big black shoe to wake him up. Grandpa may have been a prophet, but that was the first time I knew he would never be my god." (p. 29)

"'A lot of things are hard about being a woman,' she said, 'but that's our lot in life. You've got to be smarter than your predators, but don't let them know it.'" (p. 32)

"We are told the best way to withstand the temptations of the flesh, with which Outsiders will try to defile our bodies, is to teach ourselves not to desire anything by repudiating pleasure in all forms. This included tobacco, liquor, tasty foods, worldly music, entertainment for entertainment's sake, reading (other than the Bible), and anything that inspires laughter or affection. We aren't even allowed to hug one another." (p. 78-79)

"The way he describes how the Pharisees use religion to make themselves righteous reminds me of everything we do at the Field." (p. 181)

"I think a lot about rules these days. Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba. The women who get credit for producing Jesus didn't follow rules. Men were in charge of their lives, and they maneuvered in whatever ways they needed to survive. Did Grandma think about that when she taught me their stories?" (p. 209)

"Like Jezebel, I'd rather be evil than powerless." (p. 261)



We Were Once a Family: a story of love, death, and child removal in America by Roxanna Asgarian

On March 26, 2018 an SUV was found at the bottom of a steep cliff on the Pacific Coast Highway in California. Inside two adult women and several children were found - all deceased. Once they identified the women as Jennifer and Sarah Hart a quick social media search showed that this couple had adopted two sets of African-American siblings (6 children total) and were VERY prolific on social media. Soon this tragedy took a darker turn - it became obvious that this was a murder suicide and what appears to have triggered the event was a visit from social services the day before. While the Hart adults were the focus of all kind of scrutiny after this terrible event, they seemed to have escaped scrutiny in the 10 years they had these children. The investigation turned up claims of abuse and calls to social services against the women in three states. Each time they moved to avoid staying on the social service radar.

In We Were Once a Family Roxanna Asgarian looks into not just the Hart women, but more the birth families of the sets of siblings who were adopted. Both sets of siblings were adopted from Texas and sent to Minnesota to the Harts. Asgarian looks at what triggered these siblings going into foster care to begin with and why they were adopted out of state. Horrifically, in both cases the children had family members who were willing to take them in, but in each case that was denied and the children were allowed to be adopted out of state. The second set of siblings, the Davis children, had an older sibling who was separated from his siblings and subsequently struggled his entire life because of that separation. He was able to reconnect with his father at age 16, but he spent 6 years in a Residential Treatment Center - basically a juvenile detention type center for children with behavioral problems in foster care. Asgarian also looks into specifically the Texas foster care system which routinely seeks to sever parental rights the moment children are removed from the home for any reason. In the case of these two sets of siblings the reasons the children were removed were minor - they were no allegations of abuse or neglect - just parents/caregivers making one bad choice or mistake. While both families were poor and there were some drug issues, all the children were loved and had several supportive family members around them. On the other hand, the Hart women had several allegations of physical abuse and neglect that were reported to social services by the children's teachers - the Harts decided to pull their kids from public school and move. They had more reports from friends and neighbors, but each time the children were not removed and no one seemed concerned when they would pick up and move again.

It was so heartbreaking to read about these children's biological families who were fighting so hard to keep them and then they are handed over to these women who end up killing them. And to top all of it off - the biological families were not notified by law enforcement of their deaths. The Davis children's family's lawyer heard about the case and thought it sounded familiar and let the family know. The other siblings' family was found by the author and notified. There is definitely a place for foster care and removing children from dangerous or abusive homes, but as this book highlights there is definitely a double standard and many, many children are removed from loving homes because of issues around poverty. Another issue is that for foster parents or potential adoptive parents there are standards that have to be met (which is good), but often family members of foster children can't meet those standards and are denied. But, if a biological parent has 6 kids in a two bedroom house there is no one telling them they can't do that, but if a family member has their own kids and wants to take in their nieces/nephews they are told they can't because their home isn't big enough. There has to be a better way to deal with this issue. I think the worst part about this whole story is that the Harts and some of these issues were only highlighted because of the murder/suicide. How many other children are adopted out daily that have biological family member being denied the foster/adoption of them? How many adopted kids go to worse homes than they were pulled out of? Unless a larger tragedy occurs we will likely never know.

Some quotes I liked:

"The court rejected Priscilla's bid for adoption, partly because, according to state law, children must stay in a prospective adoptive home for six months before an adoption can be finalized. Even though that requirement can be waived, the judge chose not to do so. The Davis kids had spent five and a half months with Priscilla, two weeks shy of the requirement." (p. 39)

Pages 56-7 highlight some of the most egregious actions of the judge who ruled on the Davis children's adoption. His daughter literally killed someone while driving drunk and underage for drinking anyway. She spent four months in jail.

"When people adopt children from the U.S. foster system, most of them qualify for a state or federal monthly adoption subsidy that continues to assist in the care of the child until the child turns eighteen, or sometimes twenty-one. At the time the Harts pulled the children from school, Texas was sending them nearly $1,900 a month in adoption subsidies, making up half of their household income...teachers had reported six incidents to the state's social service agency in 2010 and 2011...After a while, the school stopped calling the Hart home, 'because they didn't want the children being disciplined or punished,' a later CPS investigation notes." (p. 102-3)

"Unlike kids in family homes, kids in foster care today rely on a separate state agency, Residential Child Care Investigations, to look into reports of suspected abuse or neglect. That agency has a tendency to downgrade abuse reports without ever investigating them. During four months in 2019, the agency ruled out nearly half of the more than nine hundred abuse reports it received - with no investigation whatsoever. In contrast, when an allegation of abuse is made against a child in a family home, CPS sends an investigator out to look into the complaint in every single case." (p. 116-17)

"The photo [of Devonte (Davis) Hart] was widely shared as a vision for racial harmony, with some who saw it not even realizing that it was taken at a Black Lives Matter solidarity protest. Others saw the photo differently, even at the time. In Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents, the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Isabel Wilkerson wrote that she was immediately unsettled by Devonte's face: 'People saw what they wanted to see...People saw a picture of black grace when what the world was actually looking at was an abused hostage.'" (p. 133)

"But in the larger mainstream narrative of the case, it was as if Tammy and Sherry [the birth mothers] didn't exist at all. Many narratives focused on Jennifer as the ringleader, and cast Sarah as potentially another victim, although the evidence for this view is minimal. By hyper-individualizing the story - making it about one woman with dark psychological problems - the media largely let the state systems that failed the birth mothers off the hook. It let listeners and readers off the hook, too - free to enjoy the wacky and bizarre tale without thinking of how it came to occur." (p. 216)

[At the custody trial for Dontay Davis's son who had also been taken into foster care, this was during COVID so several court appearances were via Zoom] "Gloria Glover, the county attorney, was also logged in from home. On her lap bounced her own baby, seemingly home from day care due to the pandemic. This wasn't the first of Ye's hearings Glover attended while rocking her baby; no one brought it up in court, but outside court, Rhoda, Peaches's mom, expressed her displeasure that the attorney could sit in court holding her own baby while arguing to take Rhoda's daughter's baby away from her." (p. 239) [And at the end of the book you still don't know what happened with Ye and if Dontay and Peaches got custody back or not. Their case was so delayed because of COVID and limited court appearances dragged out the whole process even more than normal.]



Silent Spring by Rachel Carson (Evening Edition book club)

I've always heard of Silent Spring and it's impact on the modern environmental/green movement, but hadn't actually read it until now when one of my book club's selected it. I've read quite a bit about industrial farming/agriculture vs. regenerative agriculture so I was hoping this would be more up my alley of personal reading. But, while I'm sure it was groundbreaking at the time, it was harder to read than I expected. It's extremely scientific and I understand that she was a scientist, but there are ways to write about topics from a scientific viewpoint that are more reader friendly to the general public - I didn't think this really was like that. It was also somewhat repetitive with whole chapters on how devastating DDT and various other toxic chemicals are for specific species - a whole chapter on birds dying, a whole chapter on fish dying, etc. And while I think it's good to note why these chemicals are so deadly and how they accumulate in internal organs, etc. all the very specific scientific explanations made it tedious to read (in my opinion). Reading it in 2023 it's also frustrating to see that not much has changed. We're not spraying DDT from airplanes anymore, but a HUGE amount of Roundup is used all over the country in both industrial and home uses. And the EPA like every other government run regulatory body is NOT helping clean up the environment despite their origin. Chemical companies and industrial agriculture companies are doing all the same shit they were in the 1940's and 50's it's just more hidden from public view. So, while I understand why this book was groundbreaking it doesn't offer any solutions outside the EPA being formed and some public pushback of the most obvious chemical spraying. I feel almost certain that my book club people are going to hate it and not finish it.

Here are some quotes I liked:

[Quote on the Epigraphs page] "I am pessimistic about the human race because it is too ingenious for its own good. Our approach to nature is to beat it into submission. We would stand a better chance of survival if we accommodated ourselves to this planet and viewed it appreciatively instead of skeptically and dictatorially. - E.B. White" (p. 7)

"Single-crop farming does not take advantage of the principles by which nature works; it is agriculture as an engineer might conceive it to be. Nature has introduced great variety into the landscape, but man has displayed a passion for simplifying it. Thus he undoes the built-in checks and balances by which nature holds the species within bounds." (p. 31)

[On the environmental impact of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal of the Army of Chemical Corps in Denver, CO] "...the most mysterious and probably in the long run the most significant feature of the whole episode was the discovery of the weed killer 2,4-D in some of the wells and in the holding ponds of the arsenal...the mystery lay in the fact that no 2,4-D had been manufactured at the arsenal at any stage of its operations. After long and careful study, the chemists at the plant concluded that the 2,4-D had been formed spontaneously in the open basins." (p. 65)

"The Michigan spraying was one of the first large-scale attacks on the Japanese beetle from the air. The choice of aldrin, one of the deadliest of all chemicals, was not determined by any peculiar suitability for Japanese beetle control, but simply by the wish to save money - aldrin was the cheapest of the compounds available. While the state in its official release to the press acknowledged that aldrin is a 'poison,' it implied that no harm could come to human beings in the heavily populated areas to which the chemical was applied." (p. 111)

"As the aerial spraying of DDT increased, so did the number of suits filed in the courts. Among them were suits brought by beekeepers in several areas of New York State. Even before the 1957 spraying, the beekeepers had suffered heavily from use of DDT in orchards...in May of that year this man lost 800 colonies after the state had sprayed a large area. So widespread and heavy was the loss that 14 other beekeepers joined him in suing the state for a quarter of a million dollars in damages." (p. 183)

"The contamination of our world is not alone a matter of mass spraying. Indeed, for most of us this is of less importance than the innumerable small-scale exposures to which we are subjected day by day, year after year." (p. 197)

"To have risked so much in our efforts to mold nature to our satisfaction and yet to have failed in achieving our goal would indeed be the final irony. Yet this, it seems, is our situation. The truth, seldom mentioned but there for anyone to see, is that nature is not so easily molded and that the insects are finding ways to circumvent our chemical attacks on them." (p. 269) [Same for current weed/farming use of Roundup creating super weeds that are Roundup resistant]

"The major chemical companies are pouring money into the universities to support research on insecticides. This creates attractive fellowships for graduate students and attractive staff positions. Biological-control studies, on the other hand, are never so endowed - for the simple reason that they do not promise anyone the fortunes that are to be made in the chemical industry. These are left to state and federal agencies, where the salaries paid are far less. This situation also explains the otherwise mystifying fact that certain outstanding entomologists are among the leading advocates of chemical control. Inquiry into the background of some of these men reveals that their entire research program is supported by the chemical industry...Can we then expect them to bite the hand that literally feeds them? But knowing their bias, how much credence can we give to their protests that insecticides are harmless?" (p. 282-83) [Same goes for pharmaceutical companies and why you can't always just "believe the science" when it's often paid for.]

"The effects of pesticides and other toxic chemical pollutants on the environment and public health had been well documented before Silent Spring, but in bits and pieces scattered through the technical literature. Environmental scientists were aware of the problem, but by and large they focused only on the narrow sector of their personal expertise. It was Rachel Carson's achievement to synthesize this knowledge into a single image that everyone, scientists and the general public alike, could easily understand." (p. 375)










Friday, March 31, 2023

March 2023 Reviews

 


Drama Free: a guide to managing unhealthy family relationships by Nedra Glover Tawwab

I really enjoyed Tawwab's first book, Set Boundaries, Find Peace, so I was excited to check out this one. Most people have boundary issues with their families or that's where a lot of issues start, so it makes logical sense that her next book would be about dealing with unhealthy family relationships. Tawwab also states that many of her therapy clients come in looking for help in "dealing with" something to do with their family. And coming from a dysfunctional family herself, she has a lot of helpful advice and tips. This book is divided into three sections - unlearning dysfunction, healing, and growing. The section on growing is all chapters about troubleshooting specific family relationships - parents, children, in-laws, blended families, etc. Tawwab gives good advice and continuously reminds the reader to give yourself grace if you're trying to work through unhealthy family dynamics. I like that each chapter starts with an example pulled from her own therapy clients or her Instagram comments or messages that highlight the topic of that chapter. She also includes a chart (p. 78) of the stages of change that explains the different levels of change for someone trying to deal with family dysfunction. I think this is helpful to show that all of this is a process and there are steps you can take along the way to having healthier family relationships. It's a quick read, but it's the kind of book you might want to have on hand to refer back to in the future. Overall, I think this is a great resource if you are trying to work on creating a drama free relationship with your family.

Some quotes I liked:

"In dysfunctional families, 'you're mature for your age' often means this:
- You know how to stay out of the way.
- You're an emotional confidant for an adult.
- You make more sense than others around you.
- You know how to be invisible.
- You don't cause problems." (p. 42)

"You survive when you don't repeat the cycle, but you thrive when you create a new legacy and trajectory. Conscious awareness and effort are what separate someone who thrives from someone who survives. You can consciously create a different life, and those who do are known as 'cyclebreakers.'" (p. 92)

"Teaching yourself what you were never taught is one of the most powerful ways to become a cyclebreaker." (p. 96)

"Inauthenticity becomes a big problem when we feel we must purchase a greeting card for a family member with whom we have a dysfunctional relationship...No one talks about how hard it is to find a card for a parent with whom you don't have a healthy relationship. Greeting cards are geared toward healthy relationships, and it can be sad to be reminded of what you don't have." (p. 239-40) [I very vividly remember Tawwab's IG post about this. I honestly felt like I was the only person who struggled with this until I saw the hundreds of comments from people who also struggled.]



Waco Rising: David Koresh, the FBI, and the birth of America's modern militias by Kevin Cook

I was 13 when Waco happened and while I remember it being on the news all the time I didn't pay much attention to it then. When I saw this book I was interested to read more about this tragic event. Cook does a good job of giving the history of the Branch Davidians (CRAZY) and how Vernon Howell, aka David Koresh, came to take over the leadership. The Branch Davidians were a cult and they were doing some illegal things - mainly underage sex/marriage, polygamy (only David Koresh though), and illegally modifying semi-automatic rifles to fully automatic. But, did that justify the 51-day siege that killed 86 people? Of course, hindsight is 20/20, but both the ATF and FBI seriously botched this whole event. Not that David Koresh and the Branch Davidians didn't have a role, but the two together created a HUGE cluster of craziness and unnecessary deaths. The ATF and FBI seemed to truly believe that Koresh was going to pull a Jim Jones-style mass suicide. There doesn't seem to be any information as to why they thought this, especially since Jonestown was 15 years prior and Jones had preached about "revolutionary suicide" during his entire "ministry." While Koresh's version of crazy was that he was the modern incarnation of Christ who would lead the final Armageddon battle against the world - hence his stockpiling of weapons and modified arsenal. What the ATF and FBI didn't understand was that what was happening with the siege at Waco played right into Koresh's prophecy and teachings and all his followers truly believed they were in the final Armageddon battle and whether they died in it or not was God's will. The FBI also refused to bring in any theologians or Biblical scholars to advise them because they didn't want the negotiating to turn into theological arguing with Koresh, but these scholars may have been able to help the FBI see how what they were doing was playing into Koresh's hand. Once everything was finally over the FBI (or someone) hid evidence that would have made the FBI look worse than they already did. That perceived hiding of evidence spurred the creation of more militias who felt that Waco was a huge governmental overreach.

Some of the reviews I read complained that Cook "forced a leftist agenda" by equating January 6th with Waco and bringing in Alex Jones. He didn't do that, but he did show how Waco became a rallying cry for militias who were worried the government would be coming for them next. And Alex Jones literally got his start because of his interest in Waco and even raised money to rebuild the church on the original site. While I'm sure every author has an agenda or angle or reasons why they write a book on a topic, I personally didn't feel like there was an obvious agenda with this book. I felt like Cook did a good job of showing how both sides did wrong things and how they also fed into each other in a way that created this horrible event. Although I do think the ATF should be held accountable for the botched raid that sparked this whole thing. Overall, a very interesting and well-written book about a dark chapter in America's history.

Some quotes I liked:

[When the ATF raid was discovered by Koresh] "The ATF had been counting on surprising Koresh; now the element of surprise was gone. Rodriguez pleaded with his bosses to call off the raid, but they were determined to stick to the plan...He thought his bosses were about to make a dangerous mistake. 'I went outside, and sat down, and I started to cry.'" (p. 53)

"Texas Governor Ann Richards had an even more personal interest. She was from Waco. Richards had told the ATF she wasn't sure federal forces should be using Texas National Guard equipment to raid a bunch of evangelical Christians in her hometown. Waco was known as Baylor's home, the birthplace of Dr Pepper, and the nation's leading producer of church pews. Governor Richards didn't want her hometown getting famous as a site of federal overreach." (p. 101)

"The ATF had kept three cameras trained on the compound from the undercover house across Double-EE Ranch Road, but now ATF agents reported that two of the cameras had malfunctioned. A third camera somehow disappeared from a locked evidence room in the days after the fire. It was never recovered...The compound's front doors lay flat after the rest of the compound burned down. Those bullet-pocked steel doors were key pieces of evidence. Koresh had told investigators that the holes in the doors would prove there had been far more incoming rounds than bullets fired the other way on February 28 - evidence the ATF raiders had been the aggressors...Now, during the initial investigation of a cordoned-off crime scene, the right-hand door, twenty square feet in size and weighing more than a hundred pounds, disappeared. It has never been found. Like the ATF's broken and missing cameras, the lost door would feature in conspiracy theories revolving around Waco." (p. 190)



Beaver Land: how one weird rodent made America by Leila Philip

Leila Philip becomes interested in beavers when she discovers them living in a pond near her house in Connecticut and when they disappear she is alarmed and wants to find out what could have happened to them. This leads her down the rabbit hole of all things beavers. She never really finds out what happened to her beavers, but does find out a whole LOT about beavers and how helpful they are to the environment.

I really wanted to like this book, but I had to force myself to finish it. Yes, there were some interesting facts and people in the book, but it was pretty dry and not really an engaging read. I read Eager: the surprising, secret life of beavers and why they matter by Ben Goldfarb a few years ago and LOVED it. He really brought all the beaver information to life and showed just how important they are to the environment especially when it comes to water. Philip tried to do the same, but it just came across very dry and there were lots of chapters with her trekking around with trappers and scientists in the woods. I also felt like she spent WAY too long on trapping and I still couldn't really get a good read on why trappers want to trap instead of hunting. Hunting for food I can totally understand. Trapping for fur I don't and as much as I liked Herb, the trapper she followed, I still think it's a terrible practice. The book wasn't all bad - she had some good points and highlights, but overall it was dry and long and not nearly as engaging as Eager by Goldfarb.

Some quotes I liked:

"But are beavers intelligent creatures? It's a mystery. Throughout history, humans have studied their lodges and dams and canals, their skills at felling and transporting trees, their expertise at engineering. When three or four work together, they can roll a hundred-pound boulder and set it in their dam. Perhaps, like ants and bees, they have a kind of intelligence that we as humans simply cannot fathom." (p. 5)

"Coyote are so adaptive, like beavers, that they disrupt our usual divisions of what is urban and what is rural. Wild animals are supposed to live in the woods, but as coyote and beavers and wolves keep demonstrating, in twenty-first-century North America, they regularly don't...A pair of coyote den in Central Park. Coyote have been photographed riding mass transit in Portland, Oregon, and walking onto Wrigley Field. In Chicago, Dr. Stan Gehrt, who heads up the longest urban coyote research project in the country, has identified a generation of coyote that now teach their young to wait at traffic lights and avoid eating rats, saving the coyote from getting hit by cars and from ingesting fatal doses of rat poison." (p. 62-63)

"Geologist Dr. Ellen Wohl, who studies beaver meadows and river systems in Colorado, calls the years from 1600 to 1900 - essentially the three hundred years of the fur trade - the 'great drying.' Once beavers were gone from forested headwaters, and everywhere else, not only did the wetlands dry up, but the very shape and function of riverine systems changed. Scientists now estimate that more than 80 percent of the riverside marshes, swamps, lakes, ponds, and floodplain forests of North America and Europe have disappeared." (p. 166)

"When flooding occurs, beaver meadows serve to absorb the floodwater, lessening the force of the current and thus its ability to scour the landscape, washing critical soils away. When there is no rain and rising temperatures cause plants and trees to lose even more water through transpiration, resulting in severe drought, beaver meadows serve as secret caches of water that keep a river system from completely drying up." (p. 169)

"Grace Bush's work [in the Chesapeake Bay area] supported what researchers in other states and Canada were discovering - the removal of beavers during the fur trade, then the decades of deforestation, coupled with massive draining of wetlands to harness waterpower and for agriculture - had greatly contributed to many of the environmental problems we were now struggling to address." (p. 239-40)

"Beavers may have a new role in twenty-first-century North America; they are fast becoming the stars of what is now called 'wildlife recreation' because they are fun to watch. And they will not run off with your cat like a coyote, or eat your chickens like bobcats and raccoons, and they won't devour your garden like deer, rabbits, and woodchucks." (p. 249-50)



Entangled Life: how fungi make our worlds, change our minds, and shape our futures by Merlin Sheldrake

Entangled Life explores all the myriad ways that fungi are present in our world. Most people think of fungi as mushrooms, but mushrooms are just the (visible) tip of the iceberg of the fungi world. Sheldrake covers everything from the importance of mycorrizal fungi in soil to "zombie fungi" that infect carpenter ants in order to "control" them and reach the best location to release their spores and everything in between. This book really highlights just how little we know about fungi and how vital it is to so much in the world. While there was a lot of interesting and unique information, I did think it was a little science/academia heavy and was not a quick read. Overall, I did like it and I learned a lot.

Some quotes I liked:

"According to some estimates, if one teased apart the mycelium found in a gram of soil - about a teaspoon - and laid it end to end, it could stretch anywhere from a hundred meters to ten kilometers." (p. 46)

"How zombie fungi are able to control the minds of their insect hosts has long puzzled researchers...[researchers] found that the fungus becomes, to an unsettling degree, a prosthetic organ of ants' bodies. As much as forty percent of the biomass of an infected ant is fungus...However, in the ants' brains, the fungus is conspicuous by its absence...Instead, the fungus's approach appears to be pharmacological. The researchers suspect that the fungus is able to puppeteer the ants' movements by secreting chemicals that act on their muscles and central nervous system even if the fungus does not have a physical presence in their brains." (p. 97)

"In 2016, two sister studies at New York University and Johns Hopkins University administered psilocybin [the active ingredient in magic mushrooms and LSD] alongside a course of psychotherapy to patients suffering from anxiety, depression, and 'existential distress' following diagnoses with terminal cancer. After a single dose of psilocybin, eighty percent of patients showed substantial reductions in their psychological symptoms, reductions that persisted for at least six months after the dose." (p. 107)

[On using mushrooms to break down human-created waste] "In Mexico City, used diapers make up between five and fifteen percent by weight of solid waste. Researchers have found that the omnivorous Pleurotus mycelium - a white rot fungus that fruits into edible oyster mushrooms - can grow happily on a diet of used diapers. Over the course of two months, diapers introduced to Pleurotus lost about eighty-five percent of their starting mass when the plastic covering was removed, compared with a mere five percent in fungus-free controls. What's more, the mushrooms produced were healthy and free from human diseases." (p. 181)


Saturday, March 11, 2023

February 2023 Cookbook Reviews

 


Seinfeld: the official cookbook by Julie Tremaine

If you're a fan of the TV show Seinfeld this cookbook is a must have. There is a brief introduction to the main characters at the beginning of the book (I mean who is picking this up that has never seen the show though?) then it gets into the recipes. The recipes are organized like a traditional cookbook - breakfast, snacks, soup, main dishes, and dessert - but they are named more for the show like "no soup for you" for the soup chapter and "no double-dipping" for the dips chapter. Any memorable dish/meal from the show is in here like Steinbrenner's special calzone, Elaine's big salad, Fusilli Jerry, and my all-time favorite George's "What the Hell? I'll Just Eat Some Trash" eclairs. There are also some that are plays on things from the show like Puffy shirt pastry tarts and Mr. Pitt's knife and fork snickers cake. I didn't try out any of the recipes but they do look like actual recipes that would work. I'll probably end up buying this one just because I'm such a huge Seinfeld fan. Definitely worth checking out if you're a fan of the show about nothing.



Fix Me a Plate: traditional and new school soul food recipes from Scotty Scott of Cook Drank Eat by Scotty Scott

I LOVE Southern food so I'm always interested in a new Soul Food or Southern cookbook. Scott's cookbook has a good variety of Soul Food recipes and some variations on classics - like pimento cheese hush puppies. The recipes organized like a traditional cookbook by type/meal - breakfast, main dishes, seafood, sides, etc. I liked that he included a chapter called "sauce and spice" that gives sauce and seasoning mix recipes. I wasn't wild about the way some of the recipes were written in the book. There were instructions like, "Whisk errythang...in a bowl until smooth." I have no problem with speaking more casually in person or on video, but to write it out like that just seemed really odd to me. There were similar things throughout the whole book. My other main complaint was the mac & cheese recipe - mac & cheese is one of my all-time favorite dishes and it's how I judge any Southern restaurant. Scott's recipe calls for 2 cans of Cheddar cheese soup! Ugh. to me that sounds awful, but as the subtitle says these recipes are "traditional and new school Soul Food..." so I guess that's his new school version. Overall, I do think it's a solid cookbook with lots of traditional and new variations of Soul Food dishes.



February 2023 Reviews

 


The Guest List by Lucy Foley (Evening Edition book club)

An up-and-coming celebrity power couple are getting married on a remote island off the coast of Ireland. Jules and Will are beautiful, ambitious, wealthy, and surrounded by their closest friends and family - what could go wrong? Well, just about everything. The island is rumored to be haunted and seems to bring out the worst in all the wedding party and guests. The whole book covers only two days - the day before the wedding and the wedding day. Told from six different perspectives the reader gets the back story of all the main characters from flash backs from each character's view. When someone at the wedding is murdered anyone of the main characters could be the victim or the killer. This will definitely be a wedding to remember, but for all the wrong reasons.

One of my book clubs is reading this book and while I had heard of it and knew it was popular I hadn't had a big desire to read it. But, I went into reading it with no preconceived ideas of what to expect. I liked it a lot more than I thought I might. I think Foley did a great job of creating such a dark and foreboding atmosphere in the book - both with the setting and the characters. She also did a great job with each of the main characters and making them all suspicious and both possible victims and killers. I don't read tons of mysteries or thrillers, but I did not see the end coming. All the way up to the very end all the characters could have been the victim or the killer and I thought that was an impressive way to write the storyline. I'm not a huge fiction reader anymore, but I was honestly impressed with this one and how well she crafted all the storylines together.



A Life in Light by Mary Pipher

A Life in Light is Mary Pipher's memoir in short essays. She had a turbulent and dysfunctional childhood, but somehow always managed to see the light in everything. I think she shows that some of our nature is just innate. Neither of her parents showed much affection to her or her siblings, but Pipher always did even from a young age - to friends, her family, everyone. A college boyfriend asked Pipher why she wasn't angrier, this was after he went home with her for Thanksgiving and witnessed her family firsthand. She said, "I had no anger, only a deep yearning to believe my family was okay and that we loved each other." (p. 157) That was how she coped, but it just seemed built into her from birth, not a learned behavior from her family. And that has obviously helped her over the years deal with all the struggles and ups and downs of life. This collection of memoir essays highlights Pipher's quest of always looking for the light - both metaphorical light and physical light like sunrises and sunsets. Overall, a lovely collection of essays and a quick, easy read.

Some quotes I liked:

"I liked the precision and clarity of the work. Under Mrs. Oliver's tutelage, I felt as if we organized the English language and the entire world into something manageable...Her classes were calm and orderly. There was a hum in the room that came from our collective engagement in the work of the day...My home life was disorganized and chaotic, and Mrs. Oliver's class allowed me to believe things could be otherwise." (p. 100)

"Because I wasn't interested in makeup, hairstyles, or clothing. I diverted the group to topics I did enjoy. I asked how their families worked: Did their parents fight? What were the family rules? How did they get along with their siblings? What were the dinner table discussions like? Looking back, I realize that I was trying to see what normal looked like. My own family felt odd and out of place, and my parents were unusual in their habits. How did it feel to have a homemaker mother as all my friends did, and a dad who came home to quietly enjoy the evening?" (p. 123)



Harlem Shuffle by Colson Whitehead (Books & Banter book club)

Ray Carney "was only slightly bent when it came to being crooked, in practice and ambition." (p. 31) Ray grew up in a family of crooks and hoods who never lived a straight life. He is determined to do better with his life. He went to college, is married with one child and one on the way, and owns a successful furniture store. But, his crooked family tree often pops up with opportunities from time to time - especially when it comes to his cousin Freddie. And being slightly bent and making some extra money never really hurt anyone, right? Ray's slight bent toward being crooked bends a little more and a little more throughout the book. But what makes a man really crooked versus "slightly bent?" This is the question that Colson Whitehead explores through the character of Ray Carney. This is the first book in what will be a trilogy with the second book Crook Manifesto coming out in July 2023. While this book started out a little slow for me, by the end of the first section I was hooked and wanted to see what else was going to happen with Ray Carney. I'll definitely read the next book to see whether Carney can keep being "slightly bent" or if he moves into full on crooked.

Some quotes I liked:

"The way he saw it, living taught you that you didn't have to live the way you'd been taught to live. You came from one place but more important was where you decided to go." (p. 10)

"Carney was only slightly bent when it came to being crooked, in practice and ambition." (p. 31)

"...Carney knew crime's hours when he saw them - dorvay was crooked heaven, when the straight world slept and the bent got to work. An arena for thieving and scores, break-ins and hijacks, when the con man polishes the bait and the embezzler cooks the books. In-between things: night and day, rest and duty, the no-good and the up-and-up. Pick up a crowbar you know the in-between is where all the shit goes down. He upheld the misspelling in his thoughts, in keeping with his loyalty to his mistakes." (p. 136)



Acceptance: a memoir by Emi Nietfeld

Emi Nietfeld grew up in an extremely traumatic and dysfunctional home. Her father transitioned to a woman in 2002 when NO ONE was talking about trans anything and her mother was a hoarder who was extremely good at manipulating people to get her way. By the time she was a teenager Emi was cutting, bulimic, and periodically suicidal. Because her mother was so able to manipulate the doctors and play the victim Emi ended up in a mental hospital several times and also foster care. Somehow Emi got it into her head that her only way out was an Ivy League education. When almost every adult around her seemed to focus on the wrong ways to help her, Emi fought and studied her way into Harvard. But once there it was a different kind of hard - most of her fellow students were legacies or came from very wealthy and privileged families while Emi was struggling with where to go during breaks from school. Once at Harvard she also got into an EXTREMLEY abusive relationship and experienced a horrific sexual assault in Europe. What saves her is rowing. She initially laughed at the rowers because it seemed like such an Ivy League sport, but once she tries it she's hooked. And it also helps her reconnect with her body and realize how much she's abused it and allowed other to abuse it as well. She graduates from Harvard with a degree in software engineering and ends up working for both Google and Facebook in California. In California she meets her now-husband Byron. Byron and his family are everything Emi's family wasn't - normal, loving, and safe. By all accounts it looks like Emi has finally "made it" and is a successful, Ivy League graduate with a six-figure income. But now that she's finally safe all her trauma comes bubbling back up to the surface. Despite her time in mental hospitals and foster care, she's never really had quality therapy to deal with all the trauma of her past. Once she gets into therapy things do improve and that is what leads to this book.

Parts of this book were EXTREMELY hard to read. I thought once she got to Harvard things would improve, but those were the hardest chapters in my opinion. The last few chapters when she talks about meeting her husband and really getting into therapy do make for a happier ending. She is an amazing writer and if not for some of the very graphic scenes/chapters I would have rated it higher. I would give it 5 stars for writing, but knocked down to 3.5 overall because of some of the content. Overall, if you like memoirs in the vein of The Glass Castle or Educated this one falls in that same memoir genre.

Some quotes I liked:

"The world always seemed to urge me to ask for support, as if the problem were that I chose to stew in my despair instead of reaching out to the community who would break my fall. Yet when I admitted to an authority figure how bad I felt, this was what I got: Jan implying that my mom didn't love me, that she and Dave were better than I deserved. There were so few acceptable ways to need help." (p. 95)

"As the freeway scrolled past, I longed to forget the whole summer. But I knew I'd need to discuss it again and again on my college applications, prostituting my sorrow for a shot at joy. That fact seemed the saddest of them all." (p. 192)



The Faithful Spy by John Hendrix

One of my friends in one of my book clubs was talking about this book that her son read in school. I was already very familiar with Dietrich Bonhoeffer and his story, but I thought I would check out this YA non-fiction/graphic novel version. It's a quick and easy read with lots of powerful illustrations and quotes. I'm not a Bonhoeffer expert, but I feel like it does a good job of giving both an overview of Bonhoeffer's life and of the rise and fall of Hitler and the Nazi empire. He was such an inspiring person and this is definitely a good overview of his life and impact.

Some quotes I liked:

"And it was at this point that Dietrich became convinced that he must see the church as his friends Frank and Jean did, as a revolutionary force. But this revolution carried with it both a call to civil action and a mission of radical peace that held no ties to nation or state." (p. 37)

"Dietrich came to realize that what God had called him to was, ultimately, not success, but obedience. 'The ultimate question for a responsible man to ask it not how he is to extricate himself heroically from the affair, but how the coming generation is going to live.'...Faith wasn't just about creating a set of comforting thoughts about God; it was living out an ethic that called for sacrifice. You didn't just pray for the tanks to stop rolling, you threw yourself in front of them." (p. 157)



Bad Vibes Only (and other things I bring to the table) by Nora McInerny

I wasn't familiar with Nora McInerny, but picked up this book solely based on the title (and description). This collection of memoir-esque essays focus on embracing all the not-so-great parts of ourselves and not trying to always be happy with good vibes only. McInerny was widowed in her early 30's with a 2-year-old son, so she definitely knows some bad/hard times. But, even without the widowhood she was always an anxious, over-thinking kid who grew up into an anxious, over-thinking adult. McInerny is obviously a talented writer, and there were several essays I loved or laughed out loud at while reading - my two favorites were Strongest Girl in the World and Something Substantial. But, there were also some terrible essays (in my opinion) that seemed somewhat forced or not in the same vein/tone as the rest - Competitive Parenting Association was the worst in my opinion. Because of my mixed views on the essays overall I'm giving this book 3 stars. I really liked McInerny, but didn't love the whole book.

A quote I liked:

"I did not tell her that I spend hours of my life trying to attract peace and happiness like they are songbirds and I am a pine cone covered in peanut butter and birdseed." (p. 38)



We Should Not Be Friends: the story of a friendship by Will Schwalbe

I really enjoyed Will Schwalbe's previous books that were more about books and their importance in our lives, so I was excited to read this new one. But, sadly in this book Schwalbe does not come across well at all - and it's his own telling too. The book is about his unlikely friendship with Chris Maxey - or Maxey as he goes by. They meet when they are both invited to join a secret society at Yale at the end of their Junior year. Schwalbe is openly gay and leery of a loud jock like Maxey, but during their time in this secret society all the members become pretty close. Over the years Schwalbe and Maxey keep in touch kind of sporadically, but as they get older they do seem to deepen their friendship. But, the premise makes it sound like these two unlikely friends became extremely close, while Schwalbe couldn't remember Maxey's kids names for DECADES. To me that is not a close friend. It seemed like they got closer as they got older and both started having some serious health issues. I'm not sure if the health issues is what drew them together or if it was just they happened to still be on each other's radars and as they got older they each appreciated that more. Either way it wasn't a super inspiring story about friendship. Schwalbe seemed like kind of a terrible friend and pretty selfish. As someone who has also chosen not to have children, I work hard to not be a completely selfish person and friend and I do know all my friends children's names... I did think Chris Maxey had an incredibly interesting life and I would love to read a whole book about him and his life. Overall, I wouldn't recommend this one.



Wish You Were Here by Jodi Picoult (Evening Edition and Books & Banter book clubs)

Diana O'Toole is on track for all the plans she has for her life. She's working her way up in the highly competitive art auction world, she's pretty certain her boyfriend Finn is about to propose, and they are about to leave on a much-anticipated trip to the Galapagos Islands. But, the night before they are supposed to leave Finn finds out he can't. He's a medical resident and his superiors have canceled all vacation requests due to the COVID-19 virus. Finn encourages Diana to go anyway, and despite her reservations she does. But when she get to the Galapagos things are shutting down there too and she ends up trapped in a foreign country where she doesn't speak the language during the COVID-19 pandemic. This trip will change Diana in more ways than she ever imagined, just like how COVID changed things for so many people around the world.

I've always loved Jodi Picoult's books. But, I absolutely HATED her last book The Book of Two Ways because of the soul mate premise/storyline. And almost right away I could see the same theme emerging in this one. I don't want to give away anything about the "big twist" in the book, but I will list off my main complaints.

1) Diana would have NEVER gone on to the Galapagos without Finn. Nothing about how her character is described would have done that. And as you find out more about Finn he wouldn't have let her. He was WAY too needy to have her go off on this adventure without him.

2) It was insane how quickly Diana bonded with Gabriel and Beatriz. This was so over the top ridiculous - especially with a depressed, self-harming, teenage girl to bond like that with a stranger. And all at the very beginning of a world-wide mystery illness/pandemic. Come on.

3) The whole John Lennon/Yoko Ono/Sam Pride/Kitomi Ito aspect was dumb. Either make it be Yoko Ono or create a new fake celebrity for the book.

4) I did not like the whole alternate life/glimpse into another life/whatever the hell you want to call the twist. I always felt like Picoult was a better writer than to fall back on this tired and overly romanticized "soul mate" troupe. But, this is the second book to do that and I saw it coming from literally the end of chapter one.

5) Also, WAY too soon to be releasing a COVID themed book. This should have waited to be published until at least 2025. Because I follow Jodi Picoult on social media I already knew how she felt about COVID and we did not agree. That doesn't matter of course, but I felt like the sections where Finn talked about how bad things were was a little overly done/heavy handed and it was obvious she was trying to reiterate/make her point with those sections.

She is a very good writer, so I didn't hate reading the book and it was a quick read. But, I do NOT like this whole soul mate thing she's been pushing in the last two books. I didn't like this one and while I didn't guess the twist I did see the soul mate thing coming a mile away. I also did not want to read a COVID themed book because it's just not been long enough that we've been out of it. If not for both of my book clubs reading this one I would have passed. I think I might be done with reading Picoult too based on these past two books and her new soul mate theme.















Thursday, February 16, 2023

January 2023 Cookbook Reviews

 


Fresh Pasta at Home by America's Test Kitchen

This is a really good cookbook for making fresh pasta at home. There are really good instructions for making several kinds of dough and also specifies whether it's dough for rolling out pasta or for a pasta extruder. It also goes over several types/shapes of pasta and how to make those. Then it gets into full recipes using fresh pasta including a specific chapter on filled pasta and baked pasta. The last chapter is all about sauces. Overall, a very detailed, yet beginner-friendly book on making fresh pasta at home.